Paper · 1987 · Agronomy Journal

Grazing Duration Effects on Wheat Growth and Grain Yield1

S. R. Winter; E. K. Thompson

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is frequently grazed from November until March in the Southern Great Plains. The effects of grazing on growth and grain yield are not clearly understood. Irrigated grazing trials were conducted on Pullman clay loam, a fine, mixed, thermic Torrertic Paleustolls soil, to determine the growth and grain yield responses of a semidwarf winter wheat cultivar (TAM 105) planted in late August using five dates of grazing termination in the spring. An ungrazed (grain‐only) treatment that was planted in early October and managed for high grain yield was included for reference. Wheat forage was removed to a 50‐ to 70‐mm stubble height (15 to 30% ground cover) by stocker cattle ( Bos taurus L.). Growing conditions were good, and heading dates averaged near normal. Growth and grain yield responses to grazing duration were basically the same for all growing seasons. Three‐year‐average grain yields were 4.79,4.79,4.29,3.70,3.20, and 2.40 Mg ha −1 dry weight for grain‐only, 1 February, 6 March, 17 March, 31 March, and 13 April grazing termination dates, respectively. The wheat grazed until 1 February had reduced leaf area index (LAI), biomass, mean tiller weight, height, and single‐seed weight; but grain yield, tiller density at heading, and harvest index were not reduced when compared to the grain‐only wheat. Grazing until 6 March or later progressively reduced LAI, biomass, tiller weight, height, and single‐seed weight. Heading was delayed by late grazing. Tiller density and harvest index were not reduced unless grazing continued past 31 March and 17 March, respectively. Grazing until 6 March or later appeared to reduce grain yield by limiting LAI and biomass in the spring. Since grain yield was reduced even by grazing until 6 March and the wheat did not reach Feeke's stage 6 until about 1 April, removal of spikes by grazing cattle can not be a primary cause of the loss in wheat grain yield. It was observed that grazing past the period of initial elongation of the first internode delayed internode elongation. This delay in reproductive development caused by continued grazing will need to be considered if grazing termination decisions are based on stage of development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-year-average wheat grain yields were 4.79, 4.79, 4.29, 3.70, 3.20 and 2.40 Mg ha-1 dry weight for grain-only and the 1 February, 6 March, 17 March, 31 March and 13 April grazing termination dates, respectively.

Treatment
grazing termination datese1
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
4.79,4.79,4.29,3.70,3.20, and 2.40 Mg hae0
Comparator
ungrazede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yields were 4.79,4.79,4.29,3.70,3.20, and 2.40 Mg ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“1 February, 6 March, 17 March, 31 March, and 13 April grazing termination dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1110 · show in text ↑
e2

“An ungrazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grazed until 1 February had reduced leaf area index, biomass and mean tiller weight compared with grain-only wheat.

Treatment
grazed until 1 Februarye0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI), biomass, mean tiller weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“The wheat grazed until 1 February had reduced leaf area index (LAI), biomass, mean tiller weight, height, and single‐seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grazed until 1 February had reduced height and single-seed weight compared with grain-only wheat.

Treatment
grazed until 1 Februarye0
Outcome
height, and single‐seed weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“The wheat grazed until 1 February had reduced leaf area index (LAI), biomass, mean tiller weight, height, and single‐seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, tiller density at heading and harvest index of wheat grazed until 1 February were not reduced compared with grain-only wheat.

Treatment
grazed until 1 Februarye1
Outcome
grain yield, tiller density at heading, and harvest indexe0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“but grain yield, tiller density at heading, and harvest index were not reduced when compared to the grain‐only wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1358 · show in text ↑
e1

“The wheat grazed until 1 February”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing until 6 March or later progressively reduced wheat LAI, biomass and tiller weight.

Treatment
Grazing until 6 March or latere0
Outcome
LAI, biomass, tiller weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grazing until 6 March or later progressively reduced LAI, biomass, tiller weight, height, and single‐seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing until 6 March or later progressively reduced wheat height and single-seed weight.

Treatment
Grazing until 6 March or latere0
Outcome
height, and single‐seed weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grazing until 6 March or later progressively reduced LAI, biomass, tiller weight, height, and single‐seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heading of wheat was delayed by late grazing.

Treatment
late grazinge0
Outcome
Headinge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Heading was delayed by late grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat tiller density was not reduced unless grazing continued past 31 March.

Treatment
grazinge0
Outcome
Tiller densitye0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tiller density and harvest index were not reduced unless grazing continued past 31 March and 17 March, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat harvest index was not reduced unless grazing continued past 17 March.

Treatment
grazinge0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tiller density and harvest index were not reduced unless grazing continued past 31 March and 17 March, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1626 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing until 6 March or later appeared to reduce wheat grain yield by limiting leaf area index and biomass in the spring.

Treatment
Grazing until 6 March or latere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
limiting LAI and biomass in the springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grazing until 6 March or later appeared to reduce grain yield by limiting LAI and biomass in the spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1731 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of spikes by grazing cattle cannot be a primary cause of the loss in wheat grain yield.

Treatment
removal of spikes by grazing cattlee0
Outcome
loss in wheat grain yielde0
Qualifier
can not be a primary causee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“removal of spikes by grazing cattle can not be a primary cause of the loss in wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing past the period of initial elongation of the first internode delayed internode elongation in wheat.

Treatment
grazing past the period of initial elongation of the first internodee0
Outcome
internode elongatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“It was observed that grazing past the period of initial elongation of the first internode delayed internode elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2073 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and grain yield responses of wheat to grazing duration were basically the same across growing seasons.

Outcome
Growth and grain yield responses to grazing duratione0
Qualifier
basically the same for all growing seasonse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth and grain yield responses to grazing duration were basically the same for all growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grazed wheat did not reach Feekes stage 6 until about 1 April.

Outcome
Feeke's stage 6e0
Qualifier
until about 1 Aprile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“the wheat did not reach Feeke's stage 6 until about 1 April”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1856 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The delay in reproductive development caused by continued grazing should be considered when grazing termination decisions are based on stage of development.

Treatment
continued grazinge0
Outcome
grazing termination decisionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“This delay in reproductive development caused by continued grazing will need to be considered if grazing termination decisions are based on stage of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2075–2235 · show in text ↑

grazing · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 6 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

grazing · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

70 papers: 34 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

grazing · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.