Abstract
Data from three field experiments were used to determine the effects of grazing cheat-infested winter wheat during tillering on cheat and wheat growth, mature biomass, and wheat grain yield components. When terminated, grazing had reduced wheat leaf area 52% and cheat leaf area by 28%. Pooled over experiments, grazing decreased mature wheat height 7 cm and wheat yield 17%. Grazing increased dockage due primarily to cheat 9%. Grazing effects on wheat yield components, biomass, and cheat panicle density varied. Grazing did not affect cheat tillering or wheat harvest index.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing reduced wheat leaf area by 52%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grazing had reduced wheat leaf area 52% and cheat leaf area by 28%”
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing reduced cheat leaf area by 28%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- grazinge0
- Interactor
- cheat
Bromus secalinuse0weed - Outcome
- cheat leaf areae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 28%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grazing had reduced wheat leaf area 52% and cheat leaf area by 28%”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing decreased mature wheat height by 7 cm.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- grazinge0
- Outcome
- mature wheat heighte0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 7 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grazing decreased mature wheat height 7 cm and wheat yield 17%”
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing decreased wheat yield by 17%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grazing decreased mature wheat height 7 cm and wheat yield 17%”
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing increased dockage, primarily from cheat, by 9%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Grazinge0
- Interactor
- cheatBromus secalinuse0weed
- Outcome
- dockage due primarily to cheate0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grazing increased dockage due primarily to cheat 9%”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing effects on wheat yield components, biomass and cheat panicle density varied.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Grazinge0
- Interactor
- cheatBromus secalinuse0weed
- Outcome
- wheat yield components, biomass, and cheat panicle densitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grazing effects on wheat yield components, biomass, and cheat panicle density varied”
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing did not affect cheat tillering.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Grazinge0
- Interactor
- cheatBromus secalinuse0weed
- Outcome
- cheat tilleringe0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grazing did not affect cheat tillering or wheat harvest index”
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing did not affect wheat harvest index.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Grazinge0
- Outcome
- wheat harvest indexe0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grazing did not affect cheat tillering or wheat harvest index”
The same questions in other papers
grazing · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →grazing · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
66 papers more in this group
See all 70 papers →grazing · Bromus secalinus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.