Paper · 2015 · Poljoprivreda

Relationship between European corn borer feeding activity and nitrogen leaf content under different agricultural practices

Ankica Sarajlić; Emilija Raspudić; Ivana Majić; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

One of the most destructive maize pest in Croatia is European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner) (ECB). The aim of this study was to determine the influence of irrigation, nitrogen fertilization, different maize genotypes and nitrogen leaf content on ECB feeding activity. The experiment was set up in Osijek, Croatia under field conditions during 2012-2013 vegetation season. Experiment treatments were as follows: three irrigation levels (A1 - control, A2 from 60% to 80% field water capacity - FWC and A3 from 80% to100% FWC), three nitrogen fertilizer levels (B1 - 0, B2 - 100 and B3 - 200 kg N/ha) and four different genotypes (C1 - OSSK 596; C2 - OSSK 617; C3 - OSSK 602 and C4 - OSSK 552). Ear weight, number of larvae in stem and shank, tunnel length and nitrogen leaf content were evaluated. Genotype C1 was the most susceptible for following the tested variables of ECB feeding: tunnel length (TL), larvae in stalk (LS) and total number of larvae (TNL) at P<0.05 probability level. By raising the level of irrigation, European corn borer feeding activity was reduced while by raising the level of nitrogen fertilization feeding activity was increased. These results suggest that good production practices can significantly affect the susceptibility of maize to European corn borer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising irrigation reduced European corn borer feeding activity in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
raising the level of irrigatione1
Interactor
European corn borerOstrinia nubilalise0pest
Outcome
European corn borer feeding activitye1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
Osijek, Croatia under field conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ostrinia nubilalis
Ostrinia nubilalis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKeith Weller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One of the most destructive maize pest in Croatia is European corn borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“By raising the level of irrigation, European corn borer feeding activity was reduced while by raising the level of nitrogen fertilization feeding activity was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1164 · show in text ↑
e2

“The experiment was set up in Osijek, Croatia under field conditions during 2012-2013 vegetation season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising nitrogen fertilization increased European corn borer feeding activity in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
raising the level of nitrogen fertilizatione1
Interactor
European corn borerOstrinia nubilalise0pest
Outcome
European corn borer feeding activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Osijek, Croatia under field conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ostrinia nubilalis
Ostrinia nubilalis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKeith Weller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One of the most destructive maize pest in Croatia is European corn borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“By raising the level of irrigation, European corn borer feeding activity was reduced while by raising the level of nitrogen fertilization feeding activity was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1164 · show in text ↑
e2

“The experiment was set up in Osijek, Croatia under field conditions during 2012-2013 vegetation season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–379 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize genotype C1 was the most susceptible to European corn borer feeding (tunnel length, larvae in stalk and total larvae).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
C1e3
Interactor
European corn borerOstrinia nubilalise0pest
Outcome
tunnel length (TL), larvae in stalk (LS) and total number of larvae (TNL)e3
Direction
higherinferrede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ostrinia nubilalis
Ostrinia nubilalis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKeith Weller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One of the most destructive maize pest in Croatia is European corn borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“Genotype C1 was the most susceptible for following the tested variables of ECB feeding: tunnel length (TL), larvae in stalk (LS) and total number of larvae (TNL) at P<0.05 probability level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–994 · show in text ↑

irrigation · Ostrinia nubilalis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · Ostrinia nubilalis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.