Paper · 2015

Sprouting capability of shortleaf pine seedlings following clipping and burning: first-year results

David C. Clabo; Wayne K. Clatterbuck

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) is one of the few southern pine species with the ability to sprout after disturbance during the seedling age range, but little is known about sprouting success based on the type of disturbance. This study evaluates sprouting success after controlled burning conditions or manually clipping as compared to untreated controls of planted shortleaf pine 1-0 seedlings approximately 1 month after planting and on subsequent sprout production and growth one growing season following planting. As part of a larger study, randomized plots of 50 seedlings (3 blocks per treatment) were planted on February 25, 2011 at the University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest located in the foothills of the Cumberland Mountains in Morgan County, TN. The burn and clip treatments were conducted in April 2011. Survival, number of sprouts, and height of the tallest sprout were recorded for each seedling in the winter of 2012-2013. The clip treatment and the control had the same survival rate (75.3 percent) and displayed greater survival than the burn treatment. Clipping produced more sprouts and taller sprouts on average compared to the burn treatment, yet the clip treatment sprouts were approximately half the height of the control seedlings. More data on seedling response to these disturbances at older ages will be collected as the study continues. One-year-old planted seedlings do not appear to show high survival rates or produce prolific numbers of sprouts in response to early growing season burns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipped and control shortleaf pine seedlings had the same survival rate of 75.3 percent.

Taxon
Shortleaf pinePinus echinatae0
Treatment
clip treatmente2
Outcome
survival ratee2
Direction
samee2
Value
75.3 percente2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“The clip treatment and the control had the same survival rate (75.3 percent) and displayed greater survival than the burn treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipped seedlings had greater survival than burned seedlings.

Taxon
Shortleaf pinePinus echinatae0
Treatment
clip treatmente2
Outcome
survivale2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
burn treatmente2
Setting
University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“The clip treatment and the control had the same survival rate (75.3 percent) and displayed greater survival than the burn treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping produced more sprouts than the burn treatment.

Taxon
Shortleaf pinePinus echinatae0
Treatment
Clippinge3
Outcome
sproutse3
Direction
moree3
Comparator
burn treatmente3
Setting
University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–692 · show in text ↑
e3

“Clipping produced more sprouts and taller sprouts on average compared to the burn treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping produced taller sprouts on average than the burn treatment.

Taxon
Shortleaf pinePinus echinatae0
Treatment
Clippinge3
Outcome
taller sproutse3
Direction
tallere3
Comparator
burn treatmente3
Setting
University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–692 · show in text ↑
e3

“Clipping produced more sprouts and taller sprouts on average compared to the burn treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clip treatment sprouts were about half the height of control seedlings.

Taxon
Shortleaf pinePinus echinatae0
Treatment
clip treatmente4
Outcome
heighte4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
approximately halfe4
Comparator
control seedlingse4
Setting
University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–692 · show in text ↑
e4

“the clip treatment sprouts were approximately half the height of the control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-year-old seedlings showed no high survival rates or prolific sprouting after early growing season burns.

Taxon
Shortleaf pinePinus echinatae0
Treatment
early growing season burnse5
Outcome
high survival rates or produce prolific numbers of sproutse5
Direction
do not appear to show highe5
Setting
University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus echinata
Pinus echinata · TaxonChris M · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–692 · show in text ↑
e5

“do not appear to show high survival rates or produce prolific numbers of sprouts in response to early growing season burns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1529 · show in text ↑

fire · survival · Pinus echinata (shortleaf pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

climate site · survival · Pinus echinata (shortleaf pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.