Abstract
Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) is one of the few southern pine species with the ability to sprout after disturbance during the seedling age range, but little is known about sprouting success based on the type of disturbance. This study evaluates sprouting success after controlled burning conditions or manually clipping as compared to untreated controls of planted shortleaf pine 1-0 seedlings approximately 1 month after planting and on subsequent sprout production and growth one growing season following planting. As part of a larger study, randomized plots of 50 seedlings (3 blocks per treatment) were planted on February 25, 2011 at the University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest located in the foothills of the Cumberland Mountains in Morgan County, TN. The burn and clip treatments were conducted in April 2011. Survival, number of sprouts, and height of the tallest sprout were recorded for each seedling in the winter of 2012-2013. The clip treatment and the control had the same survival rate (75.3 percent) and displayed greater survival than the burn treatment. Clipping produced more sprouts and taller sprouts on average compared to the burn treatment, yet the clip treatment sprouts were approximately half the height of the control seedlings. More data on seedling response to these disturbances at older ages will be collected as the study continues. One-year-old planted seedlings do not appear to show high survival rates or produce prolific numbers of sprouts in response to early growing season burns.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Clipped and control shortleaf pine seedlings had the same survival rate of 75.3 percent.
- Taxon
- Shortleaf pine
Pinus echinatae0 - Treatment
- clip treatmente2
- Outcome
- survival ratee2
- Direction
- samee2
- Value
- 75.3 percente2
- Comparator
- controle2
- Setting
- University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”
e1“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”
e2“The clip treatment and the control had the same survival rate (75.3 percent) and displayed greater survival than the burn treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipped seedlings had greater survival than burned seedlings.
- Taxon
- Shortleaf pine
Pinus echinatae0 - Treatment
- clip treatmente2
- Outcome
- survivale2
- Direction
- greatere2
- Comparator
- burn treatmente2
- Setting
- University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”
e1“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”
e2“The clip treatment and the control had the same survival rate (75.3 percent) and displayed greater survival than the burn treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping produced more sprouts than the burn treatment.
- Taxon
- Shortleaf pine
Pinus echinatae0 - Treatment
- Clippinge3
- Outcome
- sproutse3
- Direction
- moree3
- Comparator
- burn treatmente3
- Setting
- University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”
e1“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”
e3“Clipping produced more sprouts and taller sprouts on average compared to the burn treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping produced taller sprouts on average than the burn treatment.
- Taxon
- Shortleaf pine
Pinus echinatae0 - Treatment
- Clippinge3
- Outcome
- taller sproutse3
- Direction
- tallere3
- Comparator
- burn treatmente3
- Setting
- University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”
e1“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”
e3“Clipping produced more sprouts and taller sprouts on average compared to the burn treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Clip treatment sprouts were about half the height of control seedlings.
- Taxon
- Shortleaf pine
Pinus echinatae0 - Treatment
- clip treatmente4
- Outcome
- heighte4
- Direction
- lowerinferrede4
- Value
- approximately halfe4
- Comparator
- control seedlingse4
- Setting
- University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”
e1“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”
e4“the clip treatment sprouts were approximately half the height of the control seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
One-year-old seedlings showed no high survival rates or prolific sprouting after early growing season burns.
- Taxon
- Shortleaf pine
Pinus echinatae0 - Treatment
- early growing season burnse5
- Outcome
- high survival rates or produce prolific numbers of sproutse5
- Direction
- do not appear to show highe5
- Setting
- University of Tennessee Cumberland Foreste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)”
e1“University of Tennessee Cumberland Forest”
e5“do not appear to show high survival rates or produce prolific numbers of sprouts in response to early growing season burns”
The same questions in other papers
fire · survival · Pinus echinata (shortleaf pine)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
climate site · survival · Pinus echinata (shortleaf pine)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.