Paper · 2014 · Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)

Wirkung von reduzierter Bodenbearbeitung und Gründüngung im Ökologischen Landbau auf den Beikrautbesatz

Grosse, Meike; Haase, Thorsten; Heß, Jürgen

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Reduced tillage and green manures may be capable to further improve organic crop production systems, if they are adapted to the specific needs of organic farming. One goal of the European research project TILMAN ORG (www.tilman-org.net) is to develop a more efficient weed management with at the same time increased biodiversity through improved use of green manures in different systems of reduced tillage. The results of a repeated one year trial on “Domaene Frankenhausen”, the research farm of University of Kassel, regarding the effect of both leguminous and non-leguminous green manures on weeds in four different tillage systems is the main topic of this paper. After the green manure species Sinapis alba, Trifolium resupinatum and Vicia sativa and a bare fallow as a control the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems: plough, chisel (2012) respectively disc harrow (2013), mulching + drilling and direct drilling. 2012 weed cover was generally low in the plough system compared to the other tillage systems. In the mulching + drilling- and direct drilling- systems the plots after the green manure species S. alba and T. resupinatum and the bare fallow had to be given up because weed pressure was too high. Compared to that V. sativa was able to suppress weeds considerably better and resulted in similar yields to the plough and chisel treatments 2012 on a level from 55.3 dt ha-1 to 59.1 dt ha-1. 2013 all mulching + drilling- and direct drilling- plots had to be given up because of too high weed pressure. The weed pressure in the disc harrow – system differed not significantly from the plough system, but only green manure species Vicia sativa resulted in similar oat yields compared to the plough treatments (V. sativa x disc harrow 56.2 dt ha-1, V. sativa x plough 53.9 dt ha-1). In the plough – treatments there was an overall low weed pressure. Concerning yield there were no significant differences regarding green manure treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed cover was lower in the plough system than in the other tillage systems in 2012

Treatment
plough systeme0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed covere0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
the other tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2012 weed cover was generally low in the plough system compared to the other tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012 plots after S. alba, T. resupinatum and bare fallow had to be given up because of high weed pressure in the mulching and direct drilling systems

Treatment
green manure species S. alba and T. resupinatume0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
had to be given upe0
Qualifier
weed pressure was too highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plots after the green manure species S. alba and T. resupinatum and the bare fallow had to be given up because weed pressure was too high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vicia sativa suppressed weeds considerably better than the green manure species S. alba and T. resupinatum and the bare fallow in 2012

Treatment
V. sativae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
suppresse0
Qualifier
considerably bettere0
Comparator
the green manure species S. alba and T. resupinatum and the bare fallowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to that V. sativa was able to suppress weeds considerably better and resulted in similar yields to the plough and chisel treatments 2012 on a level from 55.3 dt ha-1 to 59.1 dt ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1426 · show in text ↑
e1

“the plots after the green manure species S. alba and T. resupinatum and the bare fallow had to be given up because weed pressure was too high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1234 · show in text ↑
e2

“the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vicia sativa gave oat yields similar to the plough and chisel treatments in 2012, 55.3 to 59.1 dt/ha

Treatment
V. sativae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Value
55.3 dt ha-1 to 59.1 dt ha-1e0
Comparator
plough and chisel treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to that V. sativa was able to suppress weeds considerably better and resulted in similar yields to the plough and chisel treatments 2012 on a level from 55.3 dt ha-1 to 59.1 dt ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1426 · show in text ↑
e1

“the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2013 plots of the mulching and direct drilling systems had to be given up because of too high weed pressure

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
had to be given upe0
Qualifier
too high weed pressuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2013 all mulching + drilling- and direct drilling- plots had to be given up because of too high weed pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed pressure in the disc harrow system did not differ significantly from the plough system

Treatment
disc harrowe0
Outcome
weed pressuree0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
plough systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed pressure in the disc harrow – system differed not significantly from the plough system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1634 · show in text ↑
e1

“the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure treatment had no significant effect on yield

Treatment
green manure treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concerning yield there were no significant differences regarding green manure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1884–1971 · show in text ↑
e1

“the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plough treatments had an overall low weed pressure

Treatment
ploughe0
Outcome
weed pressuree0
Qualifier
overall lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the plough – treatments there was an overall low weed pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1882 · show in text ↑
e1

“the main crop oat was sown in four different tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vicia sativa with disc harrow gave oat yields of 56.2 dt/ha, similar to 53.9 dt/ha with plough

Treatment
V. sativa x disc harrowe0
Outcome
oat yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Value
56.2 dt ha-1e0
Qualifier
53.9 dt ha-1e0
Comparator
V. sativa x ploughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only green manure species Vicia sativa resulted in similar oat yields compared to the plough treatments (V. sativa x disc harrow 56.2 dt ha-1, V. sativa x plough 53.9 dt ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1815 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · weed · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Vicia sativa · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Vicia sativa · weed · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.