Paper · 1990 · HortScience

Influence of Seed Vigor and Preplant Herbicides on Emergence, Growth, and Yield of Tomato

Cosme A. Argerich; Kent J. Bradford; Floyd M. Ashton

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The interactions of seed vigor with herbicides were studied with respect to seedling emergence, growth, and fruit yield of processing tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. UC204C). Seed vigor (speed of germination) was enhanced by priming in an aerated solution of 0.12 m K 2 HP O 4 plus 0.15 m KN O 3 at 20C for 5 days followed by drying in forced air at 30C. The vigor of a second subsample of the same seed lot was reduced by controlled deterioration at 13% water content (dry-weight basis) for 6 days at 50C (aged seeds). Primed, aged, and untreated seeds were tested for their sensitivity to napropamide and metribuzin herbicides in greenhouse and field studies. A seed vigor × herbicide interaction was detected only under greenhouse conditions, where aged seeds were more sensitive than primed or untreated seeds to metribuzin. In April and May field plantings, seed vigor influenced the rate and percentage of final emergence and the earliness of fruit maturity, but had no effect on relative growth rate or total vegetative or reproductive yield. Napropamide at 4.5 and 9 kg·ha -1 and metribuzin at 0.4 and 0.8 kg·ha -1 had no effect on the rate or percentage of seedling emergence, relative growth rate, or total fruit yield. Metribuzin increased the mortality of seedlings at either application rate, and at 0.8 kg·ha -1 delayed early growth and fruit maturity in the April planting. Napropamide treatments did not differ from the water control for all characteristics and environments studied. Chemical names used: 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one (metribuzin); 2-(α-napthoxy)-N,N-diethyl propionamide (napropamide).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming enhanced seed vigor.

Treatment
priming in an aerated solution of 0.12 m K 2 HP O 4 plus 0.15 m KN O 3 at 20C for 5 dayse0
Outcome
Seed vigore0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Seed vigor (speed of germination) was enhanced by priming in an aerated solution of 0.12 m K 2 HP O 4 plus 0.15 m KN O 3 at 20C for 5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled deterioration reduced vigor.

Treatment
controlled deterioration at 13% water content (dry-weight basis) for 6 days at 50Ce0
Outcome
vigore0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The vigor of a second subsample of the same seed lot was reduced by controlled deterioration at 13% water content (dry-weight basis) for 6 days at 50C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–517 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under greenhouse conditions, aged seeds were more sensitive to metribuzin than primed or untreated seeds.

Material
aged seedse0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
primed or untreated seedse0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“under greenhouse conditions, where aged seeds were more sensitive than primed or untreated seeds to metribuzin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–839 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed vigor affected emergence rate and final emergence percentage in field plantings.

Material
seed vigore0
Outcome
rate and percentage of final emergencee0
Setting
field plantingse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In April and May field plantings, seed vigor influenced the rate and percentage of final emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–939 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed vigor affected earliness of fruit maturity.

Material
seed vigore0
Outcome
earliness of fruit maturitye0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“seed vigor influenced the rate and percentage of final emergence and the earliness of fruit maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–975 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed vigor had no effect on relative growth rate or total vegetative or reproductive yield.

Outcome
relative growth rate or total vegetative or reproductive yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialSetting

Verbatim

e0

“but had no effect on relative growth rate or total vegetative or reproductive yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide had no effect on emergence, growth rate or fruit yield.

Treatment
Napropamide at 4.5 and 9 kg·ha -1e0
Outcome
rate or percentage of seedling emergence, relative growth rate, or total fruit yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Napropamide at 4.5 and 9 kg·ha -1 and metribuzin at 0.4 and 0.8 kg·ha -1 had no effect on the rate or percentage of seedling emergence, relative growth rate, or total fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin had no effect on emergence, growth rate or total fruit yield.

Treatment
metribuzin at 0.4 and 0.8 kg·ha -1e0
Outcome
rate or percentage of seedling emergence, relative growth rate, or total fruit yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Napropamide at 4.5 and 9 kg·ha -1 and metribuzin at 0.4 and 0.8 kg·ha -1 had no effect on the rate or percentage of seedling emergence, relative growth rate, or total fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin increased seedling mortality at either rate.

Treatment
Metribuzine0
Outcome
mortality of seedlingse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at either application ratee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin increased the mortality of seedlings at either application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.8 kg per hectare, metribuzin delayed early growth and fruit maturity in April.

Treatment
0.8 kg·ha -1e0
Outcome
early growth and fruit maturitye0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
April plantinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“at 0.8 kg·ha -1 delayed early growth and fruit maturity in the April planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide did not differ from water controls across the tested characteristics and environments.

Treatment
Napropamide treatmentse0
Outcome
all characteristics and environments studiede0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
water controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Napropamide treatments did not differ from the water control for all characteristics and environments studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1511 · show in text ↑