Paper · 1997 · HortScience

Fruit Fresh Mass—Diameter Relationship for `Royal Gala' Apple across Seasons and among Fruit Production Regions of New Zealand

H.N. De Silva; D.S. Tustin; W.M. Cashmore; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica ). The fruit fresh-mass—diameter relationship changed with time during the season, hence no single function fitted the data well. Smooth piecewise functions that assume different relationships for intervening segments of a curve bounded by knots on the x-axis are particularly useful for modeling such data. The curve is said to be smooth because the first derivative of the function is continuous on the interval, including the knots. Two such equations, a three-parameter piecewise power function and a five-parameter spline exponential function, provided good fits to data. For both equations, the estimated mean bias on individual fruit predictions was within 5% of predicted mass over the two validating data sets. As for the precision conditional on no bias, a sample size of 20 fruit gave standard errors within 2.5% of mean predicted mass. These precisions are adequate to meet the industry requirements for monitoring fruit mass through the growing season. There was evidence of a seasonal difference in the estimated bias, but we were unable to confirm that this variation resulted from seasonal differences in fruit shape. Application of these two equations to data from other regions suggested that divergence from the estimated functional form may in fact be greater under increasingly different climatic conditions. Hence, further investigations to identify possible sources of these differences are necessary before the proposed equations can be applied across climatically different regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two piecewise equations, a three-parameter power function and a five-parameter spline exponential function, provided good fits to Royal Gala apple fruit mass–diameter data.

Material
Royal Galae1
Outcome
good fits to datae2
Comparator
a number of mass—diameter equationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two such equations, a three-parameter piecewise power function and a five-parameter spline exponential function, provided good fits to data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–731 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For both equations the estimated mean bias on individual fruit predictions was within 5% of predicted mass over the two validating data sets.

Outcome
estimated mean bias on individual fruit predictionse3
Value
within 5%e3
Qualifier
over the two validating data setse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“For both equations, the estimated mean bias on individual fruit predictions was within 5% of predicted mass over the two validating data sets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–874 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A sample of 20 fruit gave standard errors within 2.5% of mean predicted mass.

Outcome
standard errorse4
Value
within 2.5%e4
Qualifier
a sample size of 20 fruite4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e4

“As for the precision conditional on no bias, a sample size of 20 fruit gave standard errors within 2.5% of mean predicted mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was evidence of a seasonal difference in the estimated bias of the equations.

Outcome
estimated biase5
Qualifier
evidence of a seasonal differencee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was evidence of a seasonal difference in the estimated bias, but we were unable to confirm that this variation resulted from seasonal differences in fruit shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1288 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal differences in fruit shape could not be confirmed as the cause of the bias variation.

Outcome
seasonal differences in fruit shapee5
Qualifier
unable to confirm that this variation resulted frome5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was evidence of a seasonal difference in the estimated bias, but we were unable to confirm that this variation resulted from seasonal differences in fruit shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1288 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The equations applied to data from other regions suggest that divergence from the estimated functional form may be greater under increasingly different climatic conditions.

Outcome
divergence from the estimated functional forme6
Direction
greatere6
Setting
other regionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of these two equations to data from other regions suggested that divergence from the estimated functional form may in fact be greater under increasingly different climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1484 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Further investigation is needed before the proposed equations are applied across climatically different regions.

Outcome
applied across climatically different regionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e7

“further investigations to identify possible sources of these differences are necessary before the proposed equations can be applied across climatically different regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1662 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The precisions are adequate for industry requirements for monitoring fruit mass through the growing season.

Outcome
These precisions are adequatee7
Comparator
the industry requirementse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A number of mass—diameter equations were compared for their potential use in indirect measurement of fruit masses of `Royal Gala' apple ( Malus × domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e7

“These precisions are adequate to meet the industry requirements for monitoring fruit mass through the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1120 · show in text ↑