Paper · 1996 · HortScience

Hairy Vetch Mulch Favorably Impacts Yield of Processing Tomatoes

Aref A. Abdul-Baki; John R. Stommel; Alley E. Watada; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
56
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ten cultivars of processing tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in bare soil or on black polyethylene and hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth.) mulches were evaluated for yield, fruit processing quality, and leaf necrosis. Yields were higher, fruit was heavier, and leaf necrosis less in hairy vetch than in bare soil or black polyethylene mulch. With the exception of pH, yield and fruit quality component responses to mulch treatments were not cultivar-dependent. Fruit pH, soluble solids concentration, and color equaled values obtained using bare soil production practices. Percent solids was highest with black polyethylene and lowest in hairy vetch. The hairy vetch mulch delayed fruit maturity compared to the bare soil and black polyethylene. The hairy vetch cultural system has the potential to increase yield of processing tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch mulch increased tomato yield compared with bare soil or black polyethylene mulch.

Treatment
hairy vetche1
Outcome
Yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
bare soil or black polyethylene mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Yields were higher, fruit was heavier, and leaf necrosis less in hairy vetch than in bare soil or black polyethylene mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomatoes”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit was heavier with hairy vetch than with bare soil or black polyethylene mulch.

Treatment
hairy vetche1
Outcome
fruite1
Direction
heaviere1
Comparator
bare soil or black polyethylene mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“fruit was heavier, and leaf necrosis less in hairy vetch than in bare soil or black polyethylene mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomatoes”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch reduced leaf necrosis relative to bare soil or black polyethylene mulch.

Treatment
hairy vetche1
Outcome
leaf necrosise1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
bare soil or black polyethylene mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“leaf necrosis less in hairy vetch than in bare soil or black polyethylene mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomatoes”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apart from pH, tomato yield and fruit quality responses to mulch did not depend on cultivar.

Treatment
mulch treatmentse1
Outcome
yield and fruit quality component responsese1
Direction
not cultivar-dependente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“With the exception of pH, yield and fruit quality component responses to mulch treatments were not cultivar-dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomatoes”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit pH, soluble solids and color under hairy vetch equaled bare soil values.

Outcome
Fruit pH, soluble solids concentration, and colore1
Direction
equalede1
Comparator
bare soil production practicese1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fruit pH, soluble solids concentration, and color equaled values obtained using bare soil production practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomatoes”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent solids was highest with black polyethylene and lowest with hairy vetch.

Treatment
black polyethylenee1
Outcome
Percent solidse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
hairy vetche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Percent solids was highest with black polyethylene and lowest in hairy vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomatoes”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch delayed tomato fruit maturity relative to bare soil and black polyethylene.

Treatment
hairy vetch mulche1
Outcome
fruit maturitye1
Direction
delayede1
Comparator
bare soil and black polyethylenee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The hairy vetch mulch delayed fruit maturity compared to the bare soil and black polyethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomatoes”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–64 · show in text ↑

Vicia villosa · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Tomatoes with hairy vetch mulch yielded more than those with black polyethylene or no mulch.

    COVER CROPS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD PRODUCTION · 2000 · compared with black polyethylene and no mulch system

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Vicia villosa · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

mulching · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.