Paper · 2012 · Journal of Crop and Weed

Influence of plant growth regulators on fruit production of sweet orange.

S. N. Ghosh; Biswajit Bera; Sudhangshu Kumar Roy

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mosambi-cultivar of sweet orange is very popular in West Bengal and it is successfully grown in Paschimanchal (Red and laterite zone) of West Bengal. Fruit dropping in mosambi is a serious problem at there, leading to considerable yield loss. To minimize such drop, an investigation was made in a private orchard at Jhargram with plant growth regulators, consisting of 7 treatments viz., NAA at 15, 20, 25 and 30 ppm; GA3 at 25 ppm; 2, 4-D at 10 ppm and water spray (control). Four sprays were made, starting from pea stage of fruit development, at an interval of 20-30 days. Three consecutive years of study indicated that NAA at 15 ppm was the most effective in reducing the fruit drop at different months after fruit set which resulted in doubling of fruit production as compared to control. The next effective growth regulator was 2, 4-D at 10 ppm. The fruit weight was significantly improved due to application of plant growth regulators but not the fruit quality like TSS, acidity, vitamin C and juice content in fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 15 ppm was most effective at reducing fruit drop after fruit set.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Organ / stage
fruit sete0
Treatment
NAA at 15 ppme0
Outcome
fruit drope0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
water spray (control)e1

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA at 15 ppm was the most effective in reducing the fruit drop at different months after fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“water spray (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 15 ppm doubled fruit production relative to control.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
NAA at 15 ppme0
Outcome
fruit productione0
Direction
doublinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA at 15 ppm was the most effective in reducing the fruit drop at different months after fruit set which resulted in doubling of fruit production as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D at 10 ppm was the next most effective growth regulator for reducing fruit drop.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
2, 4-D at 10 ppme0
Outcome
next effective growth regulatore0
Direction
next effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The next effective growth regulator was 2, 4-D at 10 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“To minimize such drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–264 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators significantly improved fruit weight.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
water spray (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit weight was significantly improved due to application of plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“water spray (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators did not significantly improve fruit quality measures including TSS, acidity, vitamin C and juice content.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
fruit quality like TSS, acidity, vitamin C and juice content in fruite0
Comparator
water spray (control)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit weight was significantly improved due to application of plant growth regulators but not the fruit quality like TSS, acidity, vitamin C and juice content in fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“water spray (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

class · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

class · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.