Abstract
Chiasma frequency was determined from total chiasma counts, and the distribution of these exchanges was determined by the ratio of proximal to distal chiasmata. No effect of trisomy 10 could be demonstrated. Confirmation was obtained of earlier work showing more proximal and fewer distal chiasmata in K10 plants than in controls. However, diakinesis data failed to confirm the ability of K10 to increase total chiasmata as suggested from metaphase I results.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Trisomy 10 showed no demonstrable effect on chiasma measures.
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No effect of trisomy 10 could be demonstrated”
t0“MAIZE”
Claim · model-written summary
K10 plants had more proximal chiasmata than controls.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“more proximal and fewer distal chiasmata in K10 plants than in controls”
t0“MAIZE”
Claim · model-written summary
K10 plants had fewer distal chiasmata than controls.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“more proximal and fewer distal chiasmata in K10 plants than in controls”
t0“MAIZE”
Claim · model-written summary
Diakinesis data did not confirm a K10-associated increase in total chiasmata.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“diakinesis data failed to confirm the ability of K10 to increase total chiasmata as suggested from metaphase I results”
t0“MAIZE”