Abstract
This research was carried out in Çarsamba, Samsun during 1991-1993 by using Paclobutrazol which is a growth reter-dant, three times in a year (Spring, Summer and Autumn) to Cardinal, Redhaven and Glohaven peach varieties. It was also applied from the soil in spring. It was found that the application of Paclobutrazol from the soil was more effective than the leaf application. It's application in fall did not affect the vegetatif development. The spring and summer applications of it showed similiar effects. Application Paclobutrazol at a concentration of 1000 ppm to leaves was effective on vegetative development. Application of paclobu-trazol to leaves did not effect fruit quality significantly.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Soil-applied paclobutrazol was more effective than leaf application on peach vegetative growth.
- Taxon
- Peaches
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- application of Paclobutrazol from the soile0
- Outcome
- more effectivee0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- the leaf applicatione0
- Setting
- Samsunt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was found that the application of Paclobutrazol from the soil was more effective than the leaf application.”
t0“Effect of Paclobutrazol on Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Some Peaches Grown in Samsun”
Claim · model-written summary
Fall paclobutrazol application did not affect peach vegetative development.
- Taxon
- PeachesPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- application in falle0
- Outcome
- vegetatif developmente0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Setting
- Samsunt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It's application in fall did not affect the vegetatif development.”
t0“Effect of Paclobutrazol on Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Some Peaches Grown in Samsun”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring and summer paclobutrazol applications had similar effects on peach growth.
- Taxon
- PeachesPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- springe0
- Outcome
- similiar effectse0
- Direction
- similiar effectse0
- Comparator
- summer applicationse0
- Setting
- Samsunt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spring and summer applications of it showed similiar effects.”
t0“Effect of Paclobutrazol on Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Some Peaches Grown in Samsun”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar paclobutrazol at 1000 ppm affected peach vegetative development.
- Taxon
- PeachesPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- Paclobutrazol at a concentration of 1000 ppm to leavese0
- Outcome
- vegetative developmente0
- Direction
- effectivee0
- Setting
- Samsunt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application Paclobutrazol at a concentration of 1000 ppm to leaves was effective on vegetative development.”
t0“Effect of Paclobutrazol on Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Some Peaches Grown in Samsun”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar paclobutrazol did not significantly affect peach fruit quality.
- Taxon
- PeachesPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- paclobu-trazol to leavese0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- did not effecte0
- Setting
- Samsunt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of paclobu-trazol to leaves did not effect fruit quality significantly.”
t0“Effect of Paclobutrazol on Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Some Peaches Grown in Samsun”
The same questions in other papers
paclobutrazol · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →paclobutrazol · quality: grain · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.