Paper · 2014

Evaluation the Effect of Water Stress and Foliar Application of Fe Nanoparticles on Yield, Yield Components and oil Percentage of Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorious L.)

Farinaz Davar Zareii; Arash Roozbahani; Amir Hosnamidi

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the impact of iron nanoparticles foliar application on mitigating the effects of drought stress on yield, yield components and oil percentage of Goldasht spring safflower cultivar, an experiment was carried out in 2012 in the Agricultural Research Farm Station of Islamic Azad University, Roudehen branch as split plot in a completely randomized blocks design with three replications. In this experiment, the major factor of drought stress treatment included four levels (optimum irrigation, stopping the irrigation at flowering stage, stopping the irrigation at seed formation stage and stopping the irrigation at two stages of flowering and seed formation). The minor treatment factor consisted of Fe nanoparticles foliar application at four levels (non-applying the foliar, foliar application at flowering stage, foliar application at seed formation stage and foliar application at two stages of flowering and seed formation). After data analysis by SAS software, the parameters including analyses of variance and means were compared using the Duncan's Multiple Range Test at probability level of 5%. The results showed that the effects of drought stress and Fe nanoparticles were significant at probability level of 1% on traits such as the number of boll per branch, number of seeds per boll, the thousand seed weight and yield at probability level of 1%. Among the levels of drought stress, the highest yield and yield components losses were seen for most of the traits and between the levels of 2 times drought stress. The maximum yield and yield components rates related to the control treatment (optimum irrigation). Also, among the levels of Fe nanoparticles, the use of nanoparticles produced the highest rates of yield and yield components in two stages of flowering and granulation. Also, the foliar application at flowering stage was better than seed formation. Meanwhile, the control treatment had the lowest yield and yield components. Finally, the interactions of Fe nanoparticles and different levels of drought stress at 1% probability level had significant impacts on traits, including boll number per branch, number of seeds per boll, the thousand seed weight and the yield. At the end of the experiment, the 2 times stress had the highest yield and yield components losses, and 2 times of using nanoparticles had the highest rates of yield and yield components. Thus, the adverse effects of drought stress can be reduced in this area and similar areas by application of Fe nanoparticles.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly affected boll number per branch, seeds per boll, thousand seed weight and yield.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
the number of boll per branch, number of seeds per boll, the thousand seed weight and yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the effects of drought stress and Fe nanoparticles were significant at probability level of 1% on traits such as the number of boll per branch, number of seeds per boll, the thousand seed weight and yield at probability level of 1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorious L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two drought episodes produced the greatest losses in safflower yield and yield components.

Treatment
2 times stresse0
Outcome
yield and yield components lossese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 2 times stress had the highest yield and yield components losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2235–2303 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorious L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum irrigation gave the maximum yield and yield component rates.

Treatment
optimum irrigatione0
Outcome
yield and yield components ratese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield and yield components rates related to the control treatment (optimum irrigation).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorious L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe nanoparticles applied at flowering and granulation gave the highest yield and yield component rates.

Treatment
nanoparticlese0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
two stages of flowering and granulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of nanoparticles produced the highest rates of yield and yield components in two stages of flowering and granulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorious L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe nanoparticle foliar application at flowering performed better than application at seed formation.

Treatment
foliar application at flowering stagee0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
seed formatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application at flowering stage was better than seed formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorious L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought level and Fe nanoparticle application interacted significantly for boll number, seeds per boll, thousand seed weight and yield.

Treatment
Fe nanoparticles and different levels of drought stresse0
Outcome
boll number per branch, number of seeds per boll, the thousand seed weight and the yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interactions of Fe nanoparticles and different levels of drought stress at 1% probability level had significant impacts on traits, including boll number per branch, number of seeds per boll, the thousand seed weight and the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorious L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Fe nanoparticles to reduce adverse effects of drought stress in the study area and similar areas.

Treatment
application of Fe nanoparticlese0
Outcome
adverse effects of drought stresse0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the adverse effects of drought stress can be reduced in this area and similar areas by application of Fe nanoparticles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2399–2518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorious L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–166 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

30 papers: 7 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.