Paper · 1999 · PubMed

Evaluation of Biocontrol Activity of Rhizobacteria from Beta vulgaris against Heterodera schachtii.

P W Neipp; J O Becker

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One hundred fifty rhizobacteria isolated from roots of Swiss chard grown in a soil suppressive to the sugar beet cyst nematode, Heterodera schachtii, were tested for their influence on the nematode's ability to hatch and infect roots. Two screening systems were used that focused on the ability of bacteria to inhibit either nematode hatching or root infection. Most of the bacterial strains reduced hatching in vitro compared to the control, while with 5% of the strains there were 0% hatch. Seven percent of all strains significantly reduced second-stage juvenile (J2) infection of mustard roots raised in soil-less growth pouches. Eighteen strains from four genera (Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Variovorax, and Arthrobacter) were selected for greenhouse trials. In the greenhouse trials four bacterial strains, including two strains of Bacillus megaterium, reduced nematode infection of sugar beet when eggs were used as inoculum. Seven bacterial strains reduced nematode infection of sugar beet in one of two trials when plants were inoculated with J2. Most of the effective strains were Bacillus spp., primarily B. megaterium. Colonization of sugar beets roots by two B. megaterium strains was found to be stable over 30 days in the greenhouse.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most strains reduced nematode hatching in vitro.

Treatment
bacterial strainse0
Outcome
hatchinge0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the bacterial strains reduced hatching in vitro compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–441 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five percent of strains produced zero nematode hatch.

Outcome
hatche0
Value
0%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“with 5% of the strains there were 0% hatch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven percent of strains reduced juvenile infection of mustard roots.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
strainse0
Outcome
second-stage juvenile (J2) infectione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
Seven percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Seven percent of all strains significantly reduced second-stage juvenile (J2) infection of mustard roots raised in soil-less growth pouches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four bacterial strains reduced nematode infection of sugar beet using egg inoculum.

Treatment
four bacterial strainse0
Outcome
nematode infectione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
when eggs were used as inoculume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four bacterial strains, including two strains of Bacillus megaterium, reduced nematode infection of sugar beet when eggs were used as inoculum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven bacterial strains reduced nematode infection of sugar beet with juvenile inoculum in one trial.

Treatment
Seven bacterial strainse0
Outcome
nematode infectione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in one of two trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seven bacterial strains reduced nematode infection of sugar beet in one of two trials when plants were inoculated with J2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two B. megaterium strains stably colonized sugar beet roots for 30 days.

Interactor
B. megateriumPriestia megateriume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Colonization of sugar beets rootse0
Value
30 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization of sugar beets roots by two B. megaterium strains was found to be stable over 30 days in the greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1243 · show in text ↑

inoculation · pest · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.