Paper · 2020 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Interaction effect of cyst nematode, Heterodera schachtii and soft rot bacterium, Pectobacterium betavasculorum on sugar beet

Fatemeh Mohammadi; Habiballah Charehgani; Mohammad Abdollahi; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present study, sugar beet inoculated with Pectobacterium betavasculorum and two different initial population densities of Heterdera schachtii were investigated in three different infection time. Four-leaf stage seedlings were inoculated with initial population densities of 1500 and 2500 second stage juveniles of H. schachtii per pot and at seven days before, at the same time and at seven days after nematode inoculation, the soil of each pot was infested with a suspension of 10 mL/kg soil of P. betavasculorum (108 CFU/mL) and compared with non-inoculated control. The results showed that inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500 and 2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pot, respectively, decreased 13.8% and 17.5% of shoot length, 19.04% and 34.3% of shoot dry weight and 14.3% and 13.6% of the shoot fresh weight compared to the nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plants and increased 34.3% and 36.1% of cyst number in soil, 30.1% and 45.9% of female and cyst number in the root system and caused 32.7% and 30.4% of decrease in reproduction factor compared with bacterium non-inoculated plants. Inoculation of P. betavasculorum seven days prior to H. schachtii caused a greater damage compared to simultaneous inoculation of H. schachtii and P. betavasculorum and inoculation of H. schachtii seven days prior to P. betavasculorum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium applied before 1500 nematode juveniles reduced shoot length by 13.8%.

Treatment
inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500e0
Interactor
H. schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. betavasculorumPectobacterium betavasculorume0pathogen
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13.8%e0
Comparator
nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500 and 2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pot, respectively, decreased 13.8% and 17.5% of shoot length, 19.04% and 34.3% of shoot dry weight and 14.3% and 13.6% of the shoot fresh weight compared to the nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium applied before 2500 nematode juveniles reduced shoot length by 17.5%.

Treatment
2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pote0
Interactor
H. schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. betavasculorumPectobacterium betavasculorume0pathogen
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17.5%e0
Comparator
nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500 and 2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pot, respectively, decreased 13.8% and 17.5% of shoot length, 19.04% and 34.3% of shoot dry weight and 14.3% and 13.6% of the shoot fresh weight compared to the nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 1500 nematodes reduced shoot dry weight by 19.04%.

Treatment
inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500e0
Interactor
H. schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. betavasculorumPectobacterium betavasculorume0pathogen
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
19.04%e0
Comparator
nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500 and 2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pot, respectively, decreased 13.8% and 17.5% of shoot length, 19.04% and 34.3% of shoot dry weight and 14.3% and 13.6% of the shoot fresh weight compared to the nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 2500 nematodes reduced shoot dry weight by 34.3%.

Treatment
2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pote0
Interactor
H. schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. betavasculorumPectobacterium betavasculorume0pathogen
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
34.3%e0
Comparator
nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500 and 2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pot, respectively, decreased 13.8% and 17.5% of shoot length, 19.04% and 34.3% of shoot dry weight and 14.3% and 13.6% of the shoot fresh weight compared to the nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 1500 nematodes reduced shoot fresh weight by 14.3%.

Treatment
inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500e0
Interactor
H. schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. betavasculorumPectobacterium betavasculorume0pathogen
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
14.3%e0
Comparator
nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500 and 2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pot, respectively, decreased 13.8% and 17.5% of shoot length, 19.04% and 34.3% of shoot dry weight and 14.3% and 13.6% of the shoot fresh weight compared to the nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 2500 nematodes reduced shoot fresh weight by 13.6%.

Treatment
2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pote0
Interactor
H. schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. betavasculorumPectobacterium betavasculorume0pathogen
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13.6%e0
Comparator
nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation of P. betavasculorum prior to 1500 and 2500 J2s of H. schachtii per pot, respectively, decreased 13.8% and 17.5% of shoot length, 19.04% and 34.3% of shoot dry weight and 14.3% and 13.6% of the shoot fresh weight compared to the nematode inoculated + bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 1500 nematodes increased soil cyst number by 34.3%.

Outcome
cyst number in soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.3%e0
Comparator
bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased 34.3% and 36.1% of cyst number in soil, 30.1% and 45.9% of female and cyst number in the root system and caused 32.7% and 30.4% of decrease in reproduction factor compared with bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 2500 nematodes increased soil cyst number by 36.1%.

Outcome
cyst number in soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.1%e0
Comparator
bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased 34.3% and 36.1% of cyst number in soil, 30.1% and 45.9% of female and cyst number in the root system and caused 32.7% and 30.4% of decrease in reproduction factor compared with bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 1500 nematodes increased root female and cyst number by 30.1%.

Outcome
female and cyst number in the root systeme0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.1%e0
Comparator
bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased 34.3% and 36.1% of cyst number in soil, 30.1% and 45.9% of female and cyst number in the root system and caused 32.7% and 30.4% of decrease in reproduction factor compared with bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 2500 nematodes increased root female and cyst number by 45.9%.

Outcome
female and cyst number in the root systeme0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45.9%e0
Comparator
bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased 34.3% and 36.1% of cyst number in soil, 30.1% and 45.9% of female and cyst number in the root system and caused 32.7% and 30.4% of decrease in reproduction factor compared with bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 1500 nematodes reduced nematode reproduction factor by 32.7%.

Outcome
reproduction factore0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
32.7%e0
Comparator
bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased 34.3% and 36.1% of cyst number in soil, 30.1% and 45.9% of female and cyst number in the root system and caused 32.7% and 30.4% of decrease in reproduction factor compared with bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium before 2500 nematodes reduced nematode reproduction factor by 30.4%.

Outcome
reproduction factore0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
30.4%e0
Comparator
bacterium non-inoculated plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased 34.3% and 36.1% of cyst number in soil, 30.1% and 45.9% of female and cyst number in the root system and caused 32.7% and 30.4% of decrease in reproduction factor compared with bacterium non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium seven days before nematodes caused greater damage than simultaneous inoculation.

Treatment
Inoculation of P. betavasculorum seven days prior to H. schachtiie0
Interactor
H. schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. betavasculorumPectobacterium betavasculorume0pathogen
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
simultaneous inoculation of H. schachtii and P. betavasculorume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation of P. betavasculorum seven days prior to H. schachtii caused a greater damage compared to simultaneous inoculation of H. schachtii and P. betavasculorum and inoculation of H. schachtii seven days prior to P. betavasculorum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium seven days before nematodes caused greater damage than nematodes seven days before bacterium.

Treatment
Inoculation of P. betavasculorum seven days prior to H. schachtiie0
Interactor
H. schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. betavasculorumPectobacterium betavasculorume0pathogen
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
inoculation of H. schachtii seven days prior to P. betavasculorume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation of P. betavasculorum seven days prior to H. schachtii caused a greater damage compared to simultaneous inoculation of H. schachtii and P. betavasculorum and inoculation of H. schachtii seven days prior to P. betavasculorum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1354 · show in text ↑

Heterodera schachtii · pest · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Heterodera schachtii · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · pest · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · Heterodera schachtii · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.