Paper · 2015 · Developing Country Studies

Effect of Weed Management Methods on the Growth and yield of Turmeric in Metu, Illubabor, Ethiopia

Tadesse Eshetu Melaku Addisu; Fantahun Asfaw

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment on ginger weed management was conducted at Metu from2009 and 2011 with the objective of identifying effective weed management for ginger under Metu condition. Different weed management methods were compared in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The treatments were: hand weeding at 30,60,90, days after planting, .hand weeding at 45,75,105,135 &165 days after planting, hand weeding at 60,90,120,& 150 days after planting, mulching at planting followed by hand weeding at 45 and 75 days after planting, . mulching at planting followed by hand weeding at 60 and 90 days after planting, hand weeding at 30 and60 days after planting followed by mulching followed by one hand weeding as needed, The result showed that the major weeds at both locations were: Cynodon spp., Cyprus spp., Digitaria spp., Gyzotia scabra, Bidens polynchyma, Nicandra physaloides, Commelina spp., Bidens pilosa, and Ageratum conyzoides. hand weeding at 30 and60 days after planting followed by mulching followed by one hand weeding as needed, hand weeding at 45 and 75 followed by mulching followed by one hand weeding as needed and weed free and weedy controls.The result reveled a highly significant (p < 0.01) difference between treatments The result showed that as weeding frequency increased yield of ginger also increased. One early hand weeding between 30 and 45 days was critical to secure high yield of ginger. Mulching at planting followed by two hand weeding at 60 and 90 days after planting gave higher yield compared with the clean weeding treatment. Similarly hand weeding at 30 and 60 days followed by mulching and followed by one hand weeding also gave similar yield with clean weeding. Mulching at planting enhanced early germination and growth of ginger compared with non mulched ginger. On the other hand, the result also showed that ginger was poorly competed with weeds that when the first hand weeding was delayed from 30 to 45 and 60 days after planting ginger growth was affected resulting in tremendous yield loss. The result also clearly showed that three hand weeding at 30,60 and 90 days after planting was not adequate under Metu condition. When weeding was totally ignored throughout the growing period yield reduction amounted 95.5 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed weed taxa were the major weeds at both locations.

Outcome
major weedse0
Qualifier
Cynodon spp., Cyprus spp., Digitaria spp., Gyzotia scabra, Bidens polynchyma, Nicandra physaloides, Commelina spp., Bidens pilosa, and Ageratum conyzoidese0
Setting
both locationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result showed that the major weeds at both locations were: Cynodon spp., Cyprus spp., Digitaria spp., Gyzotia scabra, Bidens polynchyma, Nicandra physaloides, Commelina spp., Bidens pilosa, and Ageratum conyzoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“ginger weed management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management treatments differed significantly.

Outcome
difference between treatmentse0
Value
p < 0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result reveled a highly significant (p < 0.01) difference between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of ginger also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1344 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger yield rose as weeding frequency increased.

Treatment
weeding frequencye0
Outcome
yield of gingere0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as weeding frequency increased yield of ginger also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1344 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

One early hand weeding between 30 and 45 days was critical for high ginger yield.

Outcome
One early hand weeding between 30 and 45 dayse0
Qualifier
high yield of gingere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One early hand weeding between 30 and 45 days was critical to secure high yield of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching at planting followed by hand weeding at 60 and 90 days yielded more than clean weeding.

Treatment
Mulching at planting followed by two hand weeding at 60 and 90 days after plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
clean weeding treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching at planting followed by two hand weeding at 60 and 90 days after planting gave higher yield compared with the clean weeding treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1579 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of ginger also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 30 and 60 days followed by mulching and another weeding gave yield similar to clean weeding.

Treatment
hand weeding at 30 and 60 days followed by mulching and followed by one hand weedinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
clean weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding at 30 and 60 days followed by mulching and followed by one hand weeding also gave similar yield with clean weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1718 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of ginger also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching at planting enhanced early ginger germination and growth compared with no mulching.

Treatment
Mulching at plantinge0
Outcome
early germination and growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
non mulched gingere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching at planting enhanced early germination and growth of ginger compared with non mulched ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying first weeding from 30 to 45 or 60 days impaired ginger growth.

Treatment
first hand weeding was delayed from 30 to 45 and 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
ginger growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the first hand weeding was delayed from 30 to 45 and 60 days after planting ginger growth was affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying the first weeding caused severe ginger yield loss.

Treatment
first hand weeding was delayed from 30 to 45 and 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the first hand weeding was delayed from 30 to 45 and 60 days after planting ginger growth was affected resulting in tremendous yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–2055 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three weedings at 30, 60 and 90 days were judged inadequate at Metu.

Outcome
three hand weeding at 30,60 and 90 days after planting was not adequatee0
Setting
Metue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three hand weeding at 30,60 and 90 days after planting was not adequate under Metu condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2185 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of ginger also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No weeding during the growing period reduced yield by 95.5%.

Treatment
weeding was totally ignored throughout the growing periode0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
95.5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When weeding was totally ignored throughout the growing period yield reduction amounted 95.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2281 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of ginger also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1344 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

mulching · growth · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.