Paper · 1996

EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES FOR CONTROL OF BOTRYTIS IN SEED ONIONS, 1996

Marvin Butler; F. J. Crowe; B. A. Holliday

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fungicides benomyl (Benlate, Du Pont), thiophanate methyl (Topsin M, Elf Atochem), iprodione (Rovral, Rhone-Poulenc), vinclozolin (Ronilan, BASF), mancozeb (Manzate Du Pont) were applied for control of botrytis in seed onions grown commercially near Madras, Oregon. Scape blight was significantly reduced in plots treated with Benlate and Topsin M when compared to untreated plots. Control provided by Rovral, Ronilan, and Manzate was inadequate. As in previous years there was less soil-line rot in plots treated with Topsin M There were no statistical differences between treatments when comparing percent seed set or weight per umbel.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benlate significantly reduced scape blight versus untreated plots.

Taxon
SEED ONIONSt0
Treatment
Benlatee0
Outcome
Scape blighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Scape blight was significantly reduced in plots treated with Benlate and Topsin M when compared to untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–380 · show in text ↑
t0

“SEED ONIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsin M significantly reduced scape blight versus untreated plots.

Taxon
SEED ONIONSt0
Treatment
Topsin Me0
Outcome
Scape blighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Scape blight was significantly reduced in plots treated with Benlate and Topsin M when compared to untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–380 · show in text ↑
t0

“SEED ONIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rovral provided inadequate control.

Taxon
SEED ONIONSt0
Treatment
Rovrale0
Outcome
Controle0
Direction
inadequatee0

Verbatim

e0

“Control provided by Rovral, Ronilan, and Manzate was inadequate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“SEED ONIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ronilan provided inadequate control.

Taxon
SEED ONIONSt0
Treatment
Ronilane0
Outcome
Controle0
Direction
inadequatee0

Verbatim

e0

“Control provided by Rovral, Ronilan, and Manzate was inadequate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“SEED ONIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manzate provided inadequate control.

Taxon
SEED ONIONSt0
Treatment
Manzatee0
Outcome
Controle0
Direction
inadequatee0

Verbatim

e0

“Control provided by Rovral, Ronilan, and Manzate was inadequate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“SEED ONIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsin M plots had less soil-line rot.

Taxon
SEED ONIONSt0
Treatment
Topsin Me0
Outcome
soil-line rote0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was less soil-line rot in plots treated with Topsin M”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“SEED ONIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed set did not differ statistically between treatments.

Taxon
SEED ONIONSt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
percent seed sete0
Direction
no statistical differencese0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“There were no statistical differences between treatments when comparing percent seed set or weight per umbel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“SEED ONIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight per umbel did not differ statistically between treatments.

Taxon
SEED ONIONSt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
weight per umbele0
Direction
no statistical differencese0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“There were no statistical differences between treatments when comparing percent seed set or weight per umbel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“SEED ONIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑

benomyl · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.