Paper · 2013

Disease management and biochemical changes in groundnut inoculated with glomus fasciculatum and pathogenic macrophomina phaseolina (TASSI)goid

Khirood Doley; Paramjit Kaur Jite

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An investigation was carried out against for bio-control of soil-borne root pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina) causing charcoal root rot of groundnut plant in pot culture experiment by inoculating arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (Glomus fasciculatum). After inoculation of AM fungi (G. fasciculatum) and pathogen (M. phaseolina), there was significant decrease in severity of disease due colonization by mycorrhiza as compared to non-mycorrhizal pathogen inoculated groundnut plants. The various defense related biochemical parameters showed marked increase in their content or activity such as protein, proline, total phenol, total chlorophyll content, acid and alkaline phosphatase activity, peroxidase and polyphenol activity in mycorrhizal healthy or diseased ones in comparison to non-mycorrhizal diseased or control ones. Moreover, highest increase in defense responses was observed in mycorrhizal diseased ones. The frequency of mycorrhizal colonization in terms of arbuscular frequency showed higher colonization in mycorrhizal only treatment as compared to pathogenic mycorrhizal groundnut plants. Lower percentage of arbuscular frequency in pathogenic mycorrhizal groundnut plants confirmed that there was pathogen’s role in decreasing it when compared to non-pathogenic mycorrhizal ones. In spite of lowered arbuscular frequency due to pathogens presence, the severity of disease caused by the pathogen was significantly reduced by inoculation of AM fungi. Therefore, AM fungi may be used as other important option for bio-control purpose

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization significantly decreased the severity of disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in groundnut compared with non-mycorrhizal pathogen-inoculated plants.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
colonization by mycorrhizae0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
severity of diseasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal pathogen inoculated groundnut plantse0
Setting
pot culture experimente1

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“changes in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“After inoculation of AM fungi (G. fasciculatum) and pathogen (M. phaseolina), there was significant decrease in severity of disease due colonization by mycorrhiza as compared to non-mycorrhizal pathogen inoculated groundnut plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–478 · show in text ↑
e1

“An investigation was carried out against for bio-control of soil-borne root pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina) causing charcoal root rot of groundnut plant in pot culture experiment by inoculating arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (Glomus fasciculatum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein, proline and total phenol content showed a marked increase in mycorrhizal healthy or diseased groundnut plants compared with non-mycorrhizal diseased or control plants.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
mycorrhizal healthy or diseased onese2
Outcome
protein, proline, total phenole2
Direction
marked increasee2
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal diseased or control onese2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“changes in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“The various defense related biochemical parameters showed marked increase in their content or activity such as protein, proline, total phenol, total chlorophyll content, acid and alkaline phosphatase activity, peroxidase and polyphenol activity in mycorrhizal healthy or diseased ones in comparison to non-mycorrhizal diseased or control ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll content and acid and alkaline phosphatase activity showed a marked increase in mycorrhizal healthy or diseased groundnut plants compared with non-mycorrhizal diseased or control plants.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
mycorrhizal healthy or diseased onese2
Outcome
total chlorophyll content, acid and alkaline phosphatase activitye2
Direction
marked increasee2
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal diseased or control onese2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“changes in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“The various defense related biochemical parameters showed marked increase in their content or activity such as protein, proline, total phenol, total chlorophyll content, acid and alkaline phosphatase activity, peroxidase and polyphenol activity in mycorrhizal healthy or diseased ones in comparison to non-mycorrhizal diseased or control ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxidase and polyphenol activity showed a marked increase in mycorrhizal healthy or diseased groundnut plants compared with non-mycorrhizal diseased or control plants.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
mycorrhizal healthy or diseased onese2
Outcome
peroxidase and polyphenol activitye2
Direction
marked increasee2
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal diseased or control onese2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“changes in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“The various defense related biochemical parameters showed marked increase in their content or activity such as protein, proline, total phenol, total chlorophyll content, acid and alkaline phosphatase activity, peroxidase and polyphenol activity in mycorrhizal healthy or diseased ones in comparison to non-mycorrhizal diseased or control ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest increase in defense responses was observed in mycorrhizal diseased groundnut plants.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
mycorrhizal diseased onese3
Outcome
defense responsese3
Direction
highest increasee3

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“changes in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moreover, highest increase in defense responses was observed in mycorrhizal diseased ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular frequency was lower in pathogenic mycorrhizal groundnut plants than in non-pathogenic mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
pathogenic mycorrhizal groundnut plantse4
Outcome
arbuscular frequencye4
Direction
Lowere4
Comparator
non-pathogenic mycorrhizal onese4

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“changes in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lower percentage of arbuscular frequency in pathogenic mycorrhizal groundnut plants confirmed that there was pathogen’s role in decreasing it when compared to non-pathogenic mycorrhizal ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1293 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi may be used as another important option for bio-control of groundnut root rot.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
AM fungi may be used as other important option for bio-control purposee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“changes in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
e5

“Therefore, AM fungi may be used as other important option for bio-control purpose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1545 · show in text ↑

infection · Macrophomina phaseolina · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · Macrophomina phaseolina · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: osmolytes · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: biology · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.