Paper · 2008 · Journal of Phytopathology

Comparison of Resistance to Cotton Leaf Curl Disease (Multan/Burewala) in Gossypium hirsutum L. Varieties and Breeding Lines

K. P. Akhtar; F. F. Jamil; M. A. Haq; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Twenty‐four cotton varieties and advance breeding lines were evaluated for their resistance to cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD; Multan/Burewala) under natural field and in glasshouse conditions for two consecutive years. Resistance was based on symptom expression and disease severity index. All the cotton genotypes exposed to the vector whitefly in the field and artificially infected by grafting manifested a high level of resistance against CLCuD (Multan) with the exception of genotype NIAB‐999 that was moderately resistant. All the test varieties/breeding lines were highly susceptible to CLCuD (Burewala) both in the field and the glasshouse. However, substantial differences were noted between genotypes for disease index under field conditions. Graft inoculation studies showed that all genotypes inoculated with CLCuD (Burewala) developed disease within 9–13 days whereas those graft‐inoculated with CLCuD (Multan) developed symptoms from 15 to 22 days after grafting. Severe reduction occurred in plant morphology, fibre and yield parameters of cotton variety NIAB‐111 following inoculation with CLCuD (Burewala) as compared with CLCuD (Multan).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most cotton genotypes had high resistance to CLCuD (Multan) in field and graft tests.

Treatment
CLCuD (Multan)e0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
high levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the cotton genotypes exposed to the vector whitefly in the field and artificially infected by grafting manifested a high level of resistance against CLCuD (Multan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NIAB‐999 was moderately resistant to CLCuD (Multan).

Material
NIAB‐999e0
Outcome
resistante0
Direction
moderately resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the exception of genotype NIAB‐999 that was moderately resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested cotton genotypes were highly susceptible to CLCuD (Burewala) in field and glasshouse.

Outcome
susceptible to CLCuD (Burewala)e0
Direction
highly susceptiblee0
Setting
field and the glasshousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the test varieties/breeding lines were highly susceptible to CLCuD (Burewala) both in the field and the glasshouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton genotypes differed substantially in field disease index.

Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
substantial differencese0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantial differences were noted between genotypes for disease index under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burewala inoculation produced disease in all genotypes within 9–13 days.

Treatment
CLCuD (Burewala)e0
Outcome
developed diseasee0
Value
9–13 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all genotypes inoculated with CLCuD (Burewala) developed disease within 9–13 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multan inoculation produced symptoms 15 to 22 days after grafting.

Treatment
CLCuD (Multan)e0
Outcome
developed symptomse0
Value
15 to 22 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those graft‐inoculated with CLCuD (Multan) developed symptoms from 15 to 22 days after grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burewala inoculation severely reduced NIAB‐111 morphology, fibre and yield parameters relative to Multan.

Material
NIAB‐111e0
Treatment
inoculation with CLCuD (Burewala)e0
Outcome
plant morphology, fibre and yield parameterse0
Direction
Severe reductione0
Comparator
CLCuD (Multan)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe reduction occurred in plant morphology, fibre and yield parameters of cotton variety NIAB‐111 following inoculation with CLCuD (Burewala) as compared with CLCuD (Multan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1165 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.