Paper · 1990 · HortScience

Effect of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizae on Tissue Culture-derived Plantlets of Strawberry

MC.G. Chávez; R. Ferrera-Cerrato

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The responses of four micropropagated strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars (`Douglas', `Tioga', `Aiko', and `Pajaro') to colonization by three vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi were determined under nursery conditions. Species of VAM endophytes were Glomus sp. CPH-23, Glomus macrocarpum Tul. & Tul., and Glomus versiforme Berth & Trappe. Yield in VAM plants tended to exceed that of nonVAM plants during the latter part of the harvest, but VAM effects differed widely with host-endophyte combinations. Cultivar-endophyte combinations producing the best yield were `Douglas'-Glomus sp. CPH-23, `Tioga'- G. macrocarpum, and `Aiko'- G. versiforme. The number of strawberries per plant differed significantly ( P < 0.01) for `Tioga', depending on the cndophytes used. Root colonization by the endophytes varied from 25% to 75%. Yield was not related to colonization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM-colonized strawberry plants tended to exceed non-VAM plants in yield during the latter part of the harvest.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
VAMe0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
tended to exceede0
Qualifier
during the latter part of the harveste0
Comparator
nonVAM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield in VAM plants tended to exceed that of nonVAM plants during the latter part of the harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Douglas strawberry with Glomus sp. CPH-23 gave the best yield among the cultivar-endophyte combinations.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Douglase2
Interactor
Glomus sp. CPH-23e2symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
beste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivar-endophyte combinations producing the best yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“`Douglas'-Glomus sp. CPH-23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–616 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tioga strawberry with G. macrocarpum gave the best yield among the cultivar-endophyte combinations.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Tiogae3
Interactor
G. macrocarpumGlomus macrocarpume3symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
beste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glomus macrocarpum
Glomus macrocarpum · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivar-endophyte combinations producing the best yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“`Tioga'- G. macrocarpum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aiko strawberry with G. versiforme gave the best yield among the cultivar-endophyte combinations.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Aikoe4
Interactor
G. versiformeDiversispora versiformise4symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
beste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivar-endophyte combinations producing the best yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–583 · show in text ↑
e4

“`Aiko'- G. versiforme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–668 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of strawberries per Tioga plant differed significantly depending on the endophytes used.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Tiogae5
Treatment
cndophytes usede5
Interactor
cndophytese5symbiont
Outcome
number of strawberries per plante5
Value
P < 0.01e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“The number of strawberries per plant differed significantly ( P < 0.01) for `Tioga', depending on the cndophytes used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–787 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root colonization by the endophytes varied from 25% to 75% across strawberry plants.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
endophytese6symbiont
Outcome
Root colonizatione6
Value
25% to 75%e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
e6

“Root colonization by the endophytes varied from 25% to 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–847 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM effects on strawberry differed widely between host-endophyte combinations.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
VAM effectse7
Qualifier
with host-endophyte combinationse7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
e7

“VAM effects differed widely with host-endophyte combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–525 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of strawberry was not related to root colonization.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
colonizatione0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
not relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield was not related to colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–886 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.