Paper · 2015 · Ecology and Evolution

Interrelated effects of mycorrhiza and free‐living nitrogen fixers cascade up to aboveground herbivores

Botir Khaitov; José David Patiño‐Ruiz; Tatiana Pina; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
34
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aboveground plant performance is strongly influenced by belowground microorganisms, some of which are pathogenic and have negative effects, while others, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, usually have positive effects. Recent research revealed that belowground interactions between plants and functionally distinct groups of microorganisms cascade up to aboveground plant associates such as herbivores and their natural enemies. However, while functionally distinct belowground microorganisms commonly co-occur in the rhizosphere, their combined effects, and relative contributions, respectively, on performance of aboveground plant-associated organisms are virtually unexplored. Here, we scrutinized and disentangled the effects of free-living nitrogen-fixing (diazotrophic) bacteria Azotobacter chroococcum (DB) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Glomus mosseae (AMF) on host plant choice and reproduction of the herbivorous two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris. Additionally, we assessed plant growth, and AMF and DB occurrence and density as affected by each other. Both AMF alone and DB alone increased spider mite reproduction to similar levels, as compared to the control, and exerted additive effects under co-occurrence. These effects were similarly apparent in host plant choice, that is, the mites preferred leaves from plants with both AMF and DB to plants with AMF or DB to plants grown without AMF and DB. DB, which also act as AMF helper bacteria, enhanced root colonization by AMF, whereas AMF did not affect DB abundance. AMF but not DB increased growth of reproductive plant tissue and seed production, respectively. Both AMF and DB increased the biomass of vegetative aboveground plant tissue. Our study breaks new ground in multitrophic belowground-aboveground research by providing first insights into the fitness implications of plant-mediated interactions between interrelated belowground fungi-bacteria and aboveground herbivores.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF alone increased spider mite reproduction relative to control.

Taxon
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1
Treatment
AMF alonee0
Interactor
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1host
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
spider mite reproductione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · TaxonGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both AMF alone and DB alone increased spider mite reproduction to similar levels, as compared to the control, and exerted additive effects under co-occurrence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1308 · show in text ↑
e1

“the herbivorous two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB alone increased spider mite reproduction to levels similar to AMF alone, compared with control.

Taxon
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1
Treatment
DB alonee0
Interactor
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1host
Second interactor
DBe0symbiont
Outcome
spider mite reproductione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
similar levelse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · TaxonGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both AMF alone and DB alone increased spider mite reproduction to similar levels, as compared to the control, and exerted additive effects under co-occurrence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1308 · show in text ↑
e1

“the herbivorous two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and DB together exerted additive effects on spider mite reproduction.

Taxon
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1
Treatment
co-occurrencee0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
DBe0symbiont
Outcome
spider mite reproductione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
additive effectse0
Comparator
AMF alone and DB alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · TaxonGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both AMF alone and DB alone increased spider mite reproduction to similar levels, as compared to the control, and exerted additive effects under co-occurrence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1308 · show in text ↑
e1

“the herbivorous two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mites preferred leaves of plants with both AMF and DB over plants with either alone.

Taxon
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1
Treatment
both AMF and DBe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
DBe0symbiont
Outcome
host plant choicee0
Direction
preferrede0
Comparator
AMF or DBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · TaxonGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects were similarly apparent in host plant choice, that is, the mites preferred leaves from plants with both AMF and DB to plants with AMF or DB to plants grown without AMF and DB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1498 · show in text ↑
e1

“the herbivorous two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mites preferred plants with AMF over plants without AMF and DB.

Taxon
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1host
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
host plant choicee0
Direction
preferrede0
Comparator
plants grown without AMF and DBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · TaxonGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects were similarly apparent in host plant choice, that is, the mites preferred leaves from plants with both AMF and DB to plants with AMF or DB to plants grown without AMF and DB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1498 · show in text ↑
e1

“the herbivorous two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mites preferred plants with DB over plants without AMF and DB.

Taxon
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1
Treatment
DBe0
Interactor
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1host
Second interactor
DBe0symbiont
Outcome
host plant choicee0
Direction
preferrede0
Comparator
plants grown without AMF and DBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · TaxonGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects were similarly apparent in host plant choice, that is, the mites preferred leaves from plants with both AMF and DB to plants with AMF or DB to plants grown without AMF and DB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1498 · show in text ↑
e1

“the herbivorous two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB enhanced root colonization by AMF.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
DBe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
DBe0symbiont
Outcome
root colonization by AMFe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DB, which also act as AMF helper bacteria, enhanced root colonization by AMF, whereas AMF did not affect DB abundance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1617 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF did not affect DB abundance.

Taxon
DBe0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
DB abundancee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“DB, which also act as AMF helper bacteria, enhanced root colonization by AMF, whereas AMF did not affect DB abundance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased growth of reproductive bean tissue and seed production.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
growth of reproductive plant tissue and seed productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF but not DB increased growth of reproductive plant tissue and seed production, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1713 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB did not increase reproductive bean tissue growth or seed production.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
DBe0
Interactor
DBe0symbiont
Outcome
growth of reproductive plant tissue and seed productione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF but not DB increased growth of reproductive plant tissue and seed production, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1713 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased vegetative aboveground bean biomass.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
biomass of vegetative aboveground plant tissuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both AMF and DB increased the biomass of vegetative aboveground plant tissue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1791 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB increased vegetative aboveground bean biomass.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
DBe0
Interactor
DBe0symbiont
Outcome
biomass of vegetative aboveground plant tissuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both AMF and DB increased the biomass of vegetative aboveground plant tissue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1791 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1042 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.