Paper · 2025 · Agronomy Journal

Evaluation of strategies to reduce water use in pinto bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivation under severe water deficit conditions

Massoumeh Mohammadpur; Ali Nasrollahzadeh Asl; Mohsen Roshdi; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In this study, the effects of superabsorbent polymer, mycorrhizal fungi, nano‐potassium fertilizer, and hydrogen peroxide on yield, yield components, and some physiological traits of pinto bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘C.O.S16’) under severe water deficit conditions during the years 2018 and 2019 were examined. The experiments were carried out as a split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The studied irrigation factor included three levels (control or normal irrigation, irrigation disruption at the end of flowering stage, and irrigation disruption at the end of podding stage) in the main plots, and methods of reducing water consumption at five levels (control or no treatment, using superabsorbent polymer, inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi, using nano‐potassium fertilizer, and seed priming with hydrogen peroxide) in subplots were considered. The results showed that the effect of irrigation disruption and methods of reducing water consumption on seed yield, yield components, water use efficiency, total chlorophyll, and proline levels were significant. Furthermore, the interaction effect of irrigation disruption and methods of reducing water consumption on seed yield, water use efficiency, and leaf proline content was also significant. In this study, the highest seed yield (2133.24 kg ha⁻¹) was achieved under the normal irrigation treatment along with the use of a superabsorbent polymer. However, the irrigation disruption treatment at the end of the podding stage with the application of a superabsorbent polymer (1564.3 kg ha⁻¹) showed only a 3.87% reduction in seed yield compared to the normal irrigation treatment (1627.21 kg ha⁻¹), which was not statistically significant. This research demonstrates significant water savings; the application of a superabsorbent polymer has led to a reduction in water consumption by approximately 1600 m 3 ha⁻¹. Additionally, the irrigation disruption treatment at the podding stage using mycorrhizal fungi resulted in a 12.3% reduction in seed yield compared to the normal irrigation treatment. This shows the superior effectiveness of the superabsorbent polymer in mitigating the negative impacts of drought stress on seed yield compared to mycorrhizal fungi. Moreover, water use efficiency in the normal irrigation treatment decreased by approximately 19% compared to the treatment with irrigation disruption at the podding stage and the use of superabsorbent polymer. This result emphasizes increased water use efficiency under drought stress conditions with the use of superabsorbent polymers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation with superabsorbent polymer gave the highest seed yield, 2133.24 kg/ha.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
superabsorbent polymere1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2133.24 kg ha⁻¹e1
Comparator
normal irrigation treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the highest seed yield (2133.24 kg ha⁻¹) was achieved under the normal irrigation treatment along with the use of a superabsorbent polymer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation disruption at podding with superabsorbent polymer gave 1564.3 kg/ha seed yield, a 3.87% reduction versus normal irrigation that was not statistically significant.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
superabsorbent polymere2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
reductione2
Value
3.87%e2
Qualifier
not statistically significante2
Comparator
normal irrigation treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the irrigation disruption treatment at the end of the podding stage with the application of a superabsorbent polymer (1564.3 kg ha⁻¹) showed only a 3.87% reduction in seed yield compared to the normal irrigation treatment (1627.21 kg ha⁻¹), which was not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation disruption at podding with mycorrhizal fungi reduced seed yield by 12.3% versus normal irrigation.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
mycorrhizal fungie3
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde3
Direction
reductione3
Value
12.3%e3
Comparator
normal irrigation treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the irrigation disruption treatment at the podding stage using mycorrhizal fungi resulted in a 12.3% reduction in seed yield compared to the normal irrigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–2104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superabsorbent polymer was more effective than mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating drought effects on seed yield.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
superabsorbent polymere4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
superior effectivenesse4
Qualifier
drought stresse4
Comparator
mycorrhizal fungie4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“This shows the superior effectiveness of the superabsorbent polymer in mitigating the negative impacts of drought stress on seed yield compared to mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superabsorbent polymer reduced water consumption by approximately 1600 m3/ha.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
superabsorbent polymere5
Outcome
water consumptione5
Direction
reductione5
Value
1600 m 3 ha⁻¹e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the application of a superabsorbent polymer has led to a reduction in water consumption by approximately 1600 m 3 ha⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation disruption and water-saving methods had significant effects on seed yield, yield components, water use efficiency, total chlorophyll and proline levels.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
irrigation disruption and methods of reducing water consumptione7
Outcome
seed yielde7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 · show in text ↑
e7

“The results showed that the effect of irrigation disruption and methods of reducing water consumption on seed yield, yield components, water use efficiency, total chlorophyll, and proline levels were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1113 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.