Paper · 2010 · Indian Journal of Biotechnology

Micropropagation of Verbesina encelioides - an invasive weed.

Satish C. Jain; Renuka Jain; Renu Singh

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An efficient protocol for in vitro micropropagation of V. encelioides (Cav.) Benth. & Hook. fil. ex Gray, a medicinal weed, through hypocotyl segments of seedlings was developed on Murashige and Skoog’s (MS) medium supplemented with various concentrations of α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA, 0.50-15.00 mg/L), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP, 1.00-3.00 mg/L) and kinetin (Kn, 0.20-0.60 mg/L). Highly organized callus induction and proliferation were achieved on MS medium+NAA (1.00 mg/L)+BAP (3.00 mg/L). Optimum shoot multiplication (13.00±0.28) was achieved on MS medium+NAA (0.50 mg/L)+BAP (1.00 mg/L) with the shoot height of 1.80± 0.15 cm. Similarly, efficient root induction (8.30±0.40) was achieved on MS medium+indole 3-acetic acid (IAA, 1.00 mg/L) with the root length of 2.60± 0.34 cm as 83% of the microshoots produced roots. These plantlets were hardened in a controlled plant growth chamber, prior to ex-vitro transfer. No phenotypic differences were observed among the regenerates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified NAA and BAP medium induced organized callus proliferation.

Treatment
MS medium+NAA (1.00 mg/L)+BAP (3.00 mg/L)e0
Outcome
Highly organized callus induction and proliferatione0
Value
1.00 mg/Le0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Highly organized callus induction and proliferation were achieved on MS medium+NAA (1.00 mg/L)+BAP (3.00 mg/L).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–496 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified medium produced optimum shoot multiplication of 13.00±0.28.

Treatment
MS medium+NAA (0.50 mg/L)+BAP (1.00 mg/L)e0
Outcome
shoot multiplicatione0
Value
13.00±0.28e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum shoot multiplication (13.00±0.28) was achieved on MS medium+NAA (0.50 mg/L)+BAP (1.00 mg/L) with the shoot height of 1.80± 0.15 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–636 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots reached 1.80± 0.15 cm on the optimum shoot medium.

Outcome
shoot heighte0
Value
1.80± 0.15 cme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“with the shoot height of 1.80± 0.15 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–636 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified IAA medium induced 8.30±0.40 roots.

Treatment
MS medium+indole 3-acetic acid (IAA, 1.00 mg/L)e0
Outcome
root inductione0
Value
8.30±0.40e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“efficient root induction (8.30±0.40) was achieved on MS medium+indole 3-acetic acid (IAA, 1.00 mg/L) with the root length of 2.60± 0.34 cm as 83% of the microshoots produced roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots reached 2.60± 0.34 cm.

Outcome
root lengthe0
Value
2.60± 0.34 cme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“with the root length of 2.60± 0.34 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eighty-three percent of microshoots rooted.

Outcome
microshoots produced rootse0
Value
83%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“83% of the microshoots produced roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerates showed no phenotypic differences.

Outcome
phenotypic differencese0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“No phenotypic differences were observed among the regenerates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–987 · show in text ↑