Paper · 1980 · Florida Entomologist

Suppression of Fall Armyworm Populations by Incorporation of Insecticides into Irrigation Water

J. R. Young

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), infesting corn were controlled when chlorpyrifos + oil was applied in irrigation water with a center-pivot irrigation system. Control was achieved with 0.1 and 0.3 in (2700 and 8100 gal) water/acre.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos plus oil applied in irrigation water controlled fall armyworm larvae infesting corn.

Treatment
chlorpyrifos + oile1
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
Larvaee1
Direction
controllede1
Qualifier
0.1 and 0.3 in (2700 and 8100 gal) water/acree2
Setting
center-pivot irrigation systeme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), infesting corn were controlled when chlorpyrifos + oil was applied in irrigation water with a center-pivot irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–190 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control was achieved with 0.1 and 0.3 in (2700 and 8100 gal) water/acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–263 · show in text ↑

chlorpyrifos · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.