Paper · 1992 · Experimental Agriculture

Response of Cowpea Cultivars to Planting Pattern and Date of Sowing in Intercrops with Pearl Millet in Niger

Bonny R. Ntare; J. H. Williams

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
37
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary A two-year study was conducted at two locations in Niger to compare the response of five cowpea cultivars to two planting patterns and two sowing dates relative to the sowing date of pearl millet. All the cowpea cultivars took less time to mature when planted three weeks after millet than when sown one week after. Early-maturing cowpea cultivars had the smallest yield, whereas the yield of the local indeterminate cultivar was nearly double that of the other cultivars at both dates of sowing. Early planting of cowpea significantly depressed millet yield, but when cowpea was planted late millet yields approached those of the sole crop. The local cultivar depressed millet yields more than the other cowpea cultivars. Planting pattern had no significant effect on the yield of either cowpea or millet. Cowpea yield was reduced by more than 50% by two weeks delay in sowing, confirming that the sowing date of cowpea relative to millet is a critical factor in the Sahelian pearl millet/cowpea intercropping system. There were marked differences in the effect of cowpea cultivar on millet yield but these differences were consistent over sowing dates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cowpea cultivars took less time to mature when planted three weeks after millet than when sown one week after.

Treatment
planted three weeks after millete1
Outcome
time to maturee1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
sown one week aftere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All the cowpea cultivars took less time to mature when planted three weeks after millet than when sown one week after”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Cowpea Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-maturing cowpea cultivars had the smallest yield.

Material
Early-maturing cowpea cultivarse2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
smalleste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Early-maturing cowpea cultivars had the smallest yield, whereas the yield of the local indeterminate cultivar was nearly double that of the other cultivars at both dates of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Cowpea Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The local indeterminate cowpea cultivar yield was nearly double that of the other cultivars at both dates of sowing.

Material
local indeterminate cultivare2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
nearly doublee2
Comparator
the other cultivarse2
Setting
both dates of sowinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Early-maturing cowpea cultivars had the smallest yield, whereas the yield of the local indeterminate cultivar was nearly double that of the other cultivars at both dates of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Cowpea Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting of cowpea significantly depressed millet yield.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust1
Treatment
Early planting of cowpeae3
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae3other
Outcome
millet yielde3
Direction
significantly depressede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Early planting of cowpea significantly depressed millet yield, but when cowpea was planted late millet yields approached those of the sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–648 · show in text ↑
t1

“Intercrops with Pearl Millet in Niger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When cowpea was planted late, millet yields approached those of the sole crop.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust1
Treatment
cowpea was planted latee3
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae3other
Outcome
millet yieldse3
Direction
approachede3
Comparator
sole crope3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Early planting of cowpea significantly depressed millet yield, but when cowpea was planted late millet yields approached those of the sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–648 · show in text ↑
t1

“Intercrops with Pearl Millet in Niger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The local cowpea cultivar depressed millet yields more than the other cowpea cultivars.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust1
Treatment
The local cultivare4
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae4other
Outcome
millet yieldse4
Direction
depressede4
Comparator
the other cowpea cultivarse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The local cultivar depressed millet yields more than the other cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–729 · show in text ↑
t1

“Intercrops with Pearl Millet in Niger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern had no significant effect on the yield of cowpea or millet.

Treatment
Planting patterne5
Outcome
yield of either cowpea or millete5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Planting pattern had no significant effect on the yield of either cowpea or millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Cowpea Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield was reduced by more than 50% by a two-week delay in sowing.

Treatment
two weeks delay in sowinge6
Outcome
Cowpea yielde6
Direction
reducede6
Value
more than 50%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Cowpea yield was reduced by more than 50% by two weeks delay in sowing, confirming that the sowing date of cowpea relative to millet is a critical factor in the Sahelian pearl millet/cowpea intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Cowpea Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sowing date of cowpea relative to millet is a critical factor in the Sahelian pearl millet/cowpea intercropping system.

Treatment
the sowing date of cowpea relative to millete6
Outcome
critical factor in the Sahelian pearl millet/cowpea intercropping systeme6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Cowpea yield was reduced by more than 50% by two weeks delay in sowing, confirming that the sowing date of cowpea relative to millet is a critical factor in the Sahelian pearl millet/cowpea intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Cowpea Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences among cowpea cultivars in their effect on millet yield were consistent over sowing dates.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust1
Material
cowpea cultivare7
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae7other
Outcome
effect of cowpea cultivar on millet yielde7
Qualifier
consistent over sowing datese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“There were marked differences in the effect of cowpea cultivar on millet yield but these differences were consistent over sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1161 · show in text ↑
t1

“Intercrops with Pearl Millet in Niger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–108 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

sowing time · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 12 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

sowing time · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.