Paper · 2003 · Agronomy Journal

Planting Time For Early‐Season Pearl Millet and Grain Sorghum in Nebraska

Sìebou Pale; Stephen C. Mason; Tom D. Galusha

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] is a potential crop for the Great Plains, but there are few studies on production practices. The research objective was to determine the optimal planting time for pearl millet in Nebraska relative to sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. This would optimize pearl millet yields, thus increasing the prospect for pearl millet as a crop. Studies were conducted on Sharpsburg silty clay loam (fine, smectitic, mesic, Typic Argiudoll) and Ortello sandy loam (coarse‐loamy, mixed, mesic, Udic Haplustoll) soils between 1995 and 2001. Optimal planting times were determined by relating yields with calendar date, cumulative air heat units, cumulative soil heat units, and soil temperatures. Relative yields related to air or soil heat units were effective in determining the optimal planting time. Optimum pearl millet planting times were 399 air heat units or 410 soil heat units after 1 April for the Sharpsburg soil and 406 soil heat units for the Ortello soil. The optimal sorghum planting time was 308 air heat units or 307 soil heat units after 1 April for the Sharpsburg soil and 402 air heat units after 1 April for the Ortello soil. Both crops had large planting time windows, allowing flexibility in planting time. Sorghum outyielded pearl millet for May and early‐to mid‐June planting times by 0.57 to 2.32 Mg ha −1 while pearl millet had higher yields by 0.95 to 1.20 Mg ha −1 for late June and July planting times. Sorghum produced greater yields than pearl millet for most planting times while pearl millet produced greater yields than sorghum for very late planting times.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal pearl millet planting time on Sharpsburg soil was 399 air heat units or 410 soil heat units after 1 April.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Outcome
Optimum pearl millet planting timese1
Value
399 air heat units or 410 soil heat unitse1
Qualifier
after 1 Aprile1
Setting
Sharpsburg soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Optimum pearl millet planting times were 399 air heat units or 410 soil heat units after 1 April for the Sharpsburg soil and 406 soil heat units for the Ortello soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal pearl millet planting time on Ortello soil was 406 soil heat units.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Outcome
Optimum pearl millet planting timese1
Value
406 soil heat unitse1
Setting
Ortello soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Optimum pearl millet planting times were 399 air heat units or 410 soil heat units after 1 April for the Sharpsburg soil and 406 soil heat units for the Ortello soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sorghum planting time on Sharpsburg soil was 308 air heat units or 307 soil heat units after 1 April.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Outcome
optimal sorghum planting timee2
Value
308 air heat units or 307 soil heat unitse2
Qualifier
after 1 Aprile2
Setting
Sharpsburg soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The optimal sorghum planting time was 308 air heat units or 307 soil heat units after 1 April for the Sharpsburg soil and 402 air heat units after 1 April for the Ortello soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sorghum planting time on Ortello soil was 402 air heat units after 1 April.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Outcome
optimal sorghum planting timee2
Value
402 air heat unitse2
Qualifier
after 1 Aprile2
Setting
Ortello soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The optimal sorghum planting time was 308 air heat units or 307 soil heat units after 1 April for the Sharpsburg soil and 402 air heat units after 1 April for the Ortello soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both pearl millet and sorghum had large planting time windows, allowing flexibility in planting time.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
planting time windowse3
Qualifier
allowing flexibility in planting timee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The research objective was to determine the optimal planting time for pearl millet in Nebraska relative to sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–254 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both crops had large planting time windows, allowing flexibility in planting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum outyielded pearl millet by 0.57 to 2.32 Mg ha −1 at May and early-to mid-June planting times.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume4
Treatment
planting timese4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
outyieldede4
Value
0.57 to 2.32 Mg ha −1e4
Comparator
pearl millete4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Sorghum outyielded pearl millet for May and early‐to mid‐June planting times by 0.57 to 2.32 Mg ha −1 while pearl millet had higher yields by 0.95 to 1.20 Mg ha −1 for late June and July planting times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet yielded 0.95 to 1.20 Mg ha −1 more than sorghum at late June and July planting times.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse4
Treatment
planting timese4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
highere4
Value
0.95 to 1.20 Mg ha −1e4
Comparator
Sorghume4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Sorghum outyielded pearl millet for May and early‐to mid‐June planting times by 0.57 to 2.32 Mg ha −1 while pearl millet had higher yields by 0.95 to 1.20 Mg ha −1 for late June and July planting times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1469 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative yields related to heat units were effective in determining the optimal pearl millet planting time.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
effective in determining the optimal planting timee5
Comparator
calendar datee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Relative yields related to air or soil heat units were effective in determining the optimal planting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–839 · show in text ↑
e6

“Optimal planting times were determined by relating yields with calendar date, cumulative air heat units, cumulative soil heat units, and soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–732 · show in text ↑
e0

“The research objective was to determine the optimal planting time for pearl millet in Nebraska relative to sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–254 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 12 positive, 9 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

sowing time · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

71 papers: 50 positive, 21 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.