Paper · 1934 · Canadian Journal of Research/Canadian journal of research

STUDIES ON FOOT AND ROOT ROT OF WHEAT: III. EFFECT OF CROP ROTATION AND CULTURAL PRACTICE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF FOOT ROT OF WHEAT

W. C. Broadfoot

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The following conclusions are drawn from a uniform, co-operative, crop sequence study at seven stations in western Canada, viz., Morden, Indian Head, Swift Current, Scott, Lethbridge, Olds and Vermilion, from 1928 to 1932, inclusive (a total of 28 station-years). Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation, follows oats in a three-year rotation, follows sweet clover in a three-year rotation, or where wheat is sown late. It is increased where wheat follows wheat, barley, or western rye grass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat alternating with summerfallow had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.

Treatment
wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotatione0
Outcome
Foot-rot damage of wheate0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following summerfallow in other rotations had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.

Treatment
follows summerfallow in other rotationse0
Outcome
Foot-rot damage of wheate0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat alternating with oats had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.

Treatment
alternates with oats in a two-year rotatione0
Outcome
Foot-rot damage of wheate0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following oats in a three-year rotation had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.

Treatment
follows oats in a three-year rotatione0
Outcome
Foot-rot damage of wheate0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation, follows oats in a three-year rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following sweet clover in a three-year rotation had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.

Treatment
follows sweet clover in a three-year rotatione0
Outcome
Foot-rot damage of wheate0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation, follows oats in a three-year rotation, follows sweet clover in a three-year rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing significantly reduced wheat foot-rot damage.

Treatment
wheat is sown latee0
Outcome
Foot-rot damage of wheate0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation, follows oats in a three-year rotation, follows sweet clover in a three-year rotation, or where wheat is sown late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foot-rot damage increased when wheat followed wheat.

Treatment
wheat follows wheate0
Outcome
FOOT ROTt0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is increased where wheat follows wheat, barley, or western rye grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“FOOT ROT OF WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foot-rot damage increased when wheat followed barley.

Treatment
barleye0
Outcome
FOOT ROTt0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is increased where wheat follows wheat, barley, or western rye grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“FOOT ROT OF WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foot-rot damage increased when wheat followed western rye grass.

Treatment
western rye grasse0
Outcome
FOOT ROTt0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is increased where wheat follows wheat, barley, or western rye grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“FOOT ROT OF WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–129 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 5 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

rotation · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.