Abstract
The following conclusions are drawn from a uniform, co-operative, crop sequence study at seven stations in western Canada, viz., Morden, Indian Head, Swift Current, Scott, Lethbridge, Olds and Vermilion, from 1928 to 1932, inclusive (a total of 28 station-years). Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation, follows oats in a three-year rotation, follows sweet clover in a three-year rotation, or where wheat is sown late. It is increased where wheat follows wheat, barley, or western rye grass.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat alternating with summerfallow had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotatione0
- Outcome
- Foot-rot damage of wheate0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat following summerfallow in other rotations had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- follows summerfallow in other rotationse0
- Outcome
- Foot-rot damage of wheate0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat alternating with oats had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- alternates with oats in a two-year rotatione0
- Outcome
- Foot-rot damage of wheate0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat following oats in a three-year rotation had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- follows oats in a three-year rotatione0
- Outcome
- Foot-rot damage of wheate0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation, follows oats in a three-year rotation”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat following sweet clover in a three-year rotation had significantly reduced foot-rot damage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- follows sweet clover in a three-year rotatione0
- Outcome
- Foot-rot damage of wheate0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation, follows oats in a three-year rotation, follows sweet clover in a three-year rotation”
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing significantly reduced wheat foot-rot damage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- wheat is sown latee0
- Outcome
- Foot-rot damage of wheate0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foot-rot damage of wheat is significantly reduced where wheat alternates with summerfallow in a two-year rotation, where it follows summerfallow in other rotations, alternates with oats in a two-year rotation, follows oats in a three-year rotation, follows sweet clover in a three-year rotation, or where wheat is sown late”
Claim · model-written summary
Foot-rot damage increased when wheat followed wheat.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- wheat follows wheate0
- Outcome
- FOOT ROTt0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It is increased where wheat follows wheat, barley, or western rye grass”
t0“FOOT ROT OF WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Foot-rot damage increased when wheat followed barley.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- barleye0
- Outcome
- FOOT ROTt0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It is increased where wheat follows wheat, barley, or western rye grass”
t0“FOOT ROT OF WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Foot-rot damage increased when wheat followed western rye grass.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- western rye grasse0
- Outcome
- FOOT ROTt0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It is increased where wheat follows wheat, barley, or western rye grass”
t0“FOOT ROT OF WHEAT”
The same questions in other papers
Hordeum vulgare · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →rotation · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.