Paper · 1990 · Ecology

Analysis of the Differential Response of Five Annuals to Elevated CO2 during Growth

K. Garbutt; W. E. Williams; F. A. Bazzaz

20
claims
28
verbatim quotes
146
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects, without competition, of CO 2 on germination, growth, physiological response, and reproduction, we focussed on co—occurring species that are prominent members of an annual community in Illinois. Five species of old field annual plants—Abutilon theophrasti (C 3 ), Amaranthus retroflexus (C 4 ), Ambrosia artemisiifolia (C 3 ), Chenopodium album (C 3 ), and Setaria faberii (C 4 )–were grown for their entire life cycle as individuals at CO 2 concentration of 350 @mL/L, 500 @mL/L, and 700@mL/L. Emergence time, growth rate, shoot water status, photosynthesis, conductance, flowering time, nitrogen content, and biomass and reproductive biomass were measured. There was no detectable effect of enhanced CO 2 on timing of emergence in any of the species. Amaranthus relative growth rate (RGR) was always higher at 700 @mL/L CO 2 than at 350 @mL/L. In both Abutilon and Ambrosia, RGR was greater at 700 @mL/L than at 350 @mL/L during the first half of the experimental period, but during the second half of the period the reverse was true. Shoot water potential significantly increased (became less negative) with increasing CO 2 in Amaranthus and Setaria. Similar but statistically nonsignificant trends were found in Chenopodium and Abutilon. Overall rate of photosynthesis increased with CO 2 but there were no significant effects, at the species level, of CO 2 on photosynthetic rates. Stomatal conductance decreased with increased CO 2 at both high and low light levels in C 3 species but only at high light levels in C 4 species. In all species, intercellular CO 2 increased with external CO 2 . Amaranthus flowered significantly earlier at 700 @mL/L than at 350 @mL/L, and Setaria flowered significantly later at 700 @mL/L than at either of the other CO 2 levels. Both Abutilon and Ambrosia showed a trend towards earlier flowering but this was not statistically significant. Of the morphological characters measured at the final harvest only specific leaf area (SLA) showed a consistent response to CO 2 , decreasing with increasing CO 2 . Significant CO 2 x species interactions were also found for leaf area, leaf biomass, biomass of reproductive parts, and seed biomass indicating species—specific responses for these characters. The proportion of nitrogen declined with increasing CO 2 : there was also a significant CO 2 x species interaction caused by the different rates of decline in proportion of nitrogen among the species. The response of most characters had a significant species x CO 2 interaction. However, this was not simply caused by the C 3 /C 4 dichotomy. Reproductive biomass (seed, fruits, and flowers) increased with increasing CO 2 in Amaranthus (C 4 ) and in Chenopodium and Ambrosia (both C 3 ), but there was no change in Setaria (C 4 ), and Abutilon (C 3 ) showed a peak a 500 @mL/L. Species of the same community differed in their response to CO 2 , and these differences may help explain the outcome of competitive interactions among these species above ambient CO 2 levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced CO 2 had no detectable effect on emergence timing in any species.

Taxon
annual plantse0e1
Treatment
enhanced CO 2e0e1
Outcome
timing of emergencee0e1
Direction
no detectable effecte0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no detectable effect of enhanced CO 2 on timing of emergence in any of the species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five species of old field annual plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranthus RGR was always higher at 700 than 350 CO 2.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthuse0
Treatment
700 @mL/L CO 2e0
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
350 @mL/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amaranthus relative growth rate (RGR) was always higher at 700 @mL/L CO 2 than at 350 @mL/L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abutilon RGR was greater at high CO 2 initially and lower later.

Taxon
AbutilonAbutilone0
Treatment
700 @mL/Le0
Outcome
RGRe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
during the first half of the experimental period, but during the second half of the period the reverse was truee0
Comparator
350 @mL/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon
Abutilon · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)This photography was created by Mariluna . Other photos see here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both Abutilon and Ambrosia, RGR was greater at 700 @mL/L than at 350 @mL/L during the first half of the experimental period, but during the second half of the period the reverse was true.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambrosia RGR was greater at high CO 2 initially and lower later.

Taxon
AmbrosiaAmbrosiae0
Treatment
700 @mL/Le0
Outcome
RGRe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
during the first half of the experimental period, but during the second half of the period the reverse was truee0
Comparator
350 @mL/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ambrosia
Ambrosia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Krzysztof Ziarnek Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both Abutilon and Ambrosia, RGR was greater at 700 @mL/L than at 350 @mL/L during the first half of the experimental period, but during the second half of the period the reverse was true.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot water potential increased significantly with CO 2 in Amaranthus.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthuse0
Treatment
increasing CO 2e0
Outcome
Shoot water potentiale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot water potential significantly increased (became less negative) with increasing CO 2 in Amaranthus and Setaria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot water potential increased significantly with CO 2 in Setaria.

Taxon
SetariaSetariae0
Treatment
increasing CO 2e0
Outcome
Shoot water potentiale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria
Setaria · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot water potential significantly increased (became less negative) with increasing CO 2 in Amaranthus and Setaria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chenopodium showed a nonsignificant water-potential trend.

Taxon
ChenopodiumChenopodiume0e1
Treatment
increasing CO 2e0e1
Outcome
Shoot water potentiale0e1
Direction
increasede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium
Chenopodium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar but statistically nonsignificant trends were found in Chenopodium and Abutilon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot water potential significantly increased (became less negative) with increasing CO 2 in Amaranthus and Setaria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Abutilon showed a nonsignificant water-potential trend.

Taxon
AbutilonAbutilone0e1
Treatment
increasing CO 2e0e1
Outcome
Shoot water potentiale0e1
Direction
increasede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon
Abutilon · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)This photography was created by Mariluna . Other photos see here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar but statistically nonsignificant trends were found in Chenopodium and Abutilon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot water potential significantly increased (became less negative) with increasing CO 2 in Amaranthus and Setaria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis increased overall with CO 2, without significant species-level effects.

Taxon
annual plantse0e1
Treatment
CO 2e0e1
Outcome
rate of photosynthesise0e1
Direction
increasede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Overall rate of photosynthesis increased with CO 2 but there were no significant effects, at the species level, of CO 2 on photosynthetic rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1422 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five species of old field annual plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance declined with CO 2 in C 3 species at both light levels.

Taxon
C 3 speciese0
Treatment
increased CO 2e0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
at both high and low light levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance decreased with increased CO 2 at both high and low light levels in C 3 species but only at high light levels in C 4 species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance declined with CO 2 in C 4 species at high light.

Taxon
C 4 speciese0
Treatment
increased CO 2e0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
only at high light levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance decreased with increased CO 2 at both high and low light levels in C 3 species but only at high light levels in C 4 species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO 2 rose with external CO 2 in all species.

Taxon
annual plantse0e1
Treatment
external CO 2e0e1
Outcome
intercellular CO 2e0e1
Direction
increasede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In all species, intercellular CO 2 increased with external CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1634 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five species of old field annual plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranthus flowered earlier at 700 than 350 CO 2.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthuse0
Treatment
700 @mL/Le0
Outcome
flowerede0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
350 @mL/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amaranthus flowered significantly earlier at 700 @mL/L than at 350 @mL/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Setaria flowered later at 700 than other CO 2 levels.

Taxon
SetariaSetariae0
Treatment
700 @mL/Le0
Outcome
flowerede0
Direction
latere0
Comparator
either of the other CO 2 levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria
Setaria · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Setaria flowered significantly later at 700 @mL/L than at either of the other CO 2 levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Abutilon tended to flower earlier without statistical significance.

Taxon
AbutilonAbutilone0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon
Abutilon · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)This photography was created by Mariluna . Other photos see here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both Abutilon and Ambrosia showed a trend towards earlier flowering but this was not statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–1915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambrosia tended to flower earlier without statistical significance.

Taxon
AmbrosiaAmbrosiae0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ambrosia
Ambrosia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Krzysztof Ziarnek Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both Abutilon and Ambrosia showed a trend towards earlier flowering but this was not statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–1915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area decreased consistently as CO 2 increased.

Taxon
annual plantse0e1
Treatment
increasing CO 2e0e1
Outcome
specific leaf area (SLA)e0e1
Direction
decreasinge0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“only specific leaf area (SLA) showed a consistent response to CO 2 , decreasing with increasing CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1978–2078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five species of old field annual plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–270 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO 2 by species interactions occurred for leaf area, leaf biomass, reproductive-part biomass and seed biomass.

Taxon
annual plantse0e1
Treatment
CO 2e0e1
Outcome
leaf area, leaf biomass, biomass of reproductive parts, and seed biomasse0e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant CO 2 x species interactions were also found for leaf area, leaf biomass, biomass of reproductive parts, and seed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2213 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five species of old field annual plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen proportion declined with CO 2 and its decline varied by species.

Taxon
annual plantse0e1
Treatment
increasing CO 2e0e1
Outcome
proportion of nitrogene0e1
Direction
declinede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The proportion of nitrogen declined with increasing CO 2 : there was also a significant CO 2 x species interaction caused by the different rates of decline in proportion of nitrogen among the species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2474 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five species of old field annual plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–270 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive biomass responses to CO 2 differed among species, increasing in three species, unchanged in Setaria and peaking at intermediate CO 2 in Abutilon.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthuse0
Treatment
increasing CO 2e0
Outcome
Reproductive biomass (seed, fruits, and flowers)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reproductive biomass (seed, fruits, and flowers) increased with increasing CO 2 in Amaranthus (C 4 ) and in Chenopodium and Ambrosia (both C 3 ), but there was no change in Setaria (C 4 ), and Abutilon (C 3 ) showed a peak a 500 @mL/L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2616–2851 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · AmaranthusResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.