Paper · 1981 · Agronomy Journal

Influence of Herbicides and Tillage on Sweet Corn Double Cropped After Peas1

Bassey A. Ndon; R. G. Harvey

19
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Dinitroaniline herbicides are widely used for production of canning peas ( Pisum sativum L.). These are residual herbicides and the effects of residues has been long recognized to be influenced by tillage. Careful evaluation of these compounds was thus needed before growers could consider growing sweet corn ( Zea mays L.) following peas in a double cropping system. Peas were therefore established in a field study (Typic Argindoll finesilty, mixed mesic soil), using various dinitroaniline herbicides for weed control. After pea harvest, half the area was plowed and planted to sweet corn, and the remaining area was planted with a minimum tillage method to the same crop. Observations were made of weed growth and pea and sweet corn performance. The tillage and planting systems alone influenced both weeds and sweet corn. Giant foxtail ( Seteria faberi Herrm.) and velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) populations were 63 and 87% higher, respectively, in the sweet corn check plots planted with conventional tillage than when planted minimum till. Sweet com population and yield were 15.6 and 14.4% higher, respectively, with conventional tillage than with minimum tillage. The dinitroaniline herbicides had a significant impact on the sweet corn crop only when it was planted using the minimum till system. Dinitramine [ N 4 , N 4 ‐diethyl‐α,α,α‐trifluoro‐3,5‐dinitrotoluene‐2,4‐diamine], fluchloralin [ N ‐(2‐chloro‐ethyl)‐2,6‐dinitro‐ N ‐propyl‐4‐(trifluoro methyl)aniline], pendimethalin [ N ‐(l‐ethylpropyl)‐3,4‐dimethyl‐2,6‐dinitrobenzenamine], trifluralin (α,α,α‐trifluoro‐2,6‐dinitro‐ N,N ‐dipropyl‐ p ‐toluidine), and a combination of oryzalin [3,5‐dinitro‐ N 4 , N 4 ‐dipropyl‐sulfanilamide] plus trifluralin residues were effective in reducing giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn. Ethalfluralin [ N ‐l‐ethyl‐ N ‐(2‐methyl‐2‐propenyl)‐2,6‐dinitro‐4‐(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine] was effective in controlling the velvetleaf population. Trifluralin residues caused the greatest carryover injury to sweet corn stands and the intensity of injury increased with higher application rates. Only fluchloralin, ethalfluralin, and trifluralin at 0.84, 0.84, and 0.42 kg/ha, respectively, did not cause sweet corn injury. The best sweet corn yields were obtained following treatments of dinitramine, ethalfluralin, and fluchloralin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage raised giant foxtail populations 63% over minimum tillage in sweet-corn check plots.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Interactor
Giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
populationse0
Direction
highere0
Value
63e0
Comparator
minimum tille0

Verbatim

e0

“Giant foxtail ( Seteria faberi Herrm.) and velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) populations were 63 and 87% higher, respectively, in the sweet corn check plots planted with conventional tillage than when planted minimum till.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage raised velvetleaf populations 87% over minimum tillage in sweet-corn check plots.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
populationse0
Direction
highere0
Value
87%e0
Comparator
minimum tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giant foxtail ( Seteria faberi Herrm.) and velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) populations were 63 and 87% higher, respectively, in the sweet corn check plots planted with conventional tillage than when planted minimum till.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage raised sweet-corn population 15.6% over minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
Sweet com populatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.6e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet com population and yield were 15.6 and 14.4% higher, respectively, with conventional tillage than with minimum tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage raised sweet-corn yield 14.4% over minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.4%e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet com population and yield were 15.6 and 14.4% higher, respectively, with conventional tillage than with minimum tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitroaniline herbicides significantly affected sweet corn only under minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
dinitroaniline herbicidese0
Outcome
sweet corn crope0
Qualifier
minimum till systeme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The dinitroaniline herbicides had a significant impact on the sweet corn crop only when it was planted using the minimum till system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitramine residues reduced giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Dinitraminee0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Second interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail and velvetleaf populationse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · Second interactorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dinitramine [ N 4 , N 4 ‐diethyl‐α,α,α‐trifluoro‐3,5‐dinitrotoluene‐2,4‐diamine], fluchloralin [ N ‐(2‐chloro‐ethyl)‐2,6‐dinitro‐ N ‐propyl‐4‐(trifluoro methyl)aniline], pendimethalin [ N ‐(l‐ethylpropyl)‐3,4‐dimethyl‐2,6‐dinitrobenzenamine], trifluralin (α,α,α‐trifluoro‐2,6‐dinitro‐ N,N ‐dipropyl‐ p ‐toluidine), and a combination of oryzalin [3,5‐dinitro‐ N 4 , N 4 ‐dipropyl‐sulfanilamide] plus trifluralin residues were effective in reducing giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluchloralin residues reduced giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
fluchloraline0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Second interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail and velvetleaf populationse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · Second interactorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluchloralin [ N ‐(2‐chloro‐ethyl)‐2,6‐dinitro‐ N ‐propyl‐4‐(trifluoro methyl)aniline], pendimethalin [ N ‐(l‐ethylpropyl)‐3,4‐dimethyl‐2,6‐dinitrobenzenamine], trifluralin (α,α,α‐trifluoro‐2,6‐dinitro‐ N,N ‐dipropyl‐ p ‐toluidine), and a combination of oryzalin [3,5‐dinitro‐ N 4 , N 4 ‐dipropyl‐sulfanilamide] plus trifluralin residues were effective in reducing giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin residues reduced giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
pendimethaline0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Second interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail and velvetleaf populationse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · Second interactorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin [ N ‐(l‐ethylpropyl)‐3,4‐dimethyl‐2,6‐dinitrobenzenamine], trifluralin (α,α,α‐trifluoro‐2,6‐dinitro‐ N,N ‐dipropyl‐ p ‐toluidine), and a combination of oryzalin [3,5‐dinitro‐ N 4 , N 4 ‐dipropyl‐sulfanilamide] plus trifluralin residues were effective in reducing giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin residues reduced giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
trifluraline0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Second interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail and velvetleaf populationse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · Second interactorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trifluralin (α,α,α‐trifluoro‐2,6‐dinitro‐ N,N ‐dipropyl‐ p ‐toluidine), and a combination of oryzalin [3,5‐dinitro‐ N 4 , N 4 ‐dipropyl‐sulfanilamide] plus trifluralin residues were effective in reducing giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oryzalin plus trifluralin residues reduced giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
oryzalin [3,5‐dinitro‐ N 4 , N 4 ‐dipropyl‐sulfanilamide] plus trifluraline0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Second interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail and velvetleaf populationse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · Second interactorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of oryzalin [3,5‐dinitro‐ N 4 , N 4 ‐dipropyl‐sulfanilamide] plus trifluralin residues were effective in reducing giant foxtail and velvetleaf populations in sweet corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethalfluralin controlled velvetleaf in sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
Ethalfluraline0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
velvetleaf populatione0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethalfluralin [ N ‐l‐ethyl‐ N ‐(2‐methyl‐2‐propenyl)‐2,6‐dinitro‐4‐(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine] was effective in controlling the velvetleaf population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–1982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin residues caused the greatest carryover injury to sweet-corn stands.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Trifluralin residuese0
Outcome
carryover injury to sweet corn standse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin residues caused the greatest carryover injury to sweet corn stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2061 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet-corn injury from trifluralin increased with higher application rates.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
higher application ratese0
Outcome
intensity of injurye0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“the intensity of injury increased with higher application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2066–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluchloralin at 0.84 kg/ha did not injure sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
fluchloraline0
Outcome
sweet corn injurye0
Direction
did not causee0
Value
0.84e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Only fluchloralin, ethalfluralin, and trifluralin at 0.84, 0.84, and 0.42 kg/ha, respectively, did not cause sweet corn injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethalfluralin at 0.84 kg/ha did not injure sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
ethalfluraline0
Outcome
sweet corn injurye0
Direction
did not causee0
Value
0.84e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Only fluchloralin, ethalfluralin, and trifluralin at 0.84, 0.84, and 0.42 kg/ha, respectively, did not cause sweet corn injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin at 0.42 kg/ha did not injure sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
trifluraline0
Outcome
sweet corn injurye0
Direction
did not causee0
Value
0.42 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Only fluchloralin, ethalfluralin, and trifluralin at 0.84, 0.84, and 0.42 kg/ha, respectively, did not cause sweet corn injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitramine treatment yielded among the best sweet-corn yields.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
dinitraminee0
Outcome
sweet corn yieldse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best sweet corn yields were obtained following treatments of dinitramine, ethalfluralin, and fluchloralin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2259–2369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethalfluralin treatment yielded among the best sweet-corn yields.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
ethalfluraline0
Outcome
sweet corn yieldse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best sweet corn yields were obtained following treatments of dinitramine, ethalfluralin, and fluchloralin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2259–2369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluchloralin treatment yielded among the best sweet-corn yields.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
fluchloraline0
Outcome
sweet corn yieldse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best sweet corn yields were obtained following treatments of dinitramine, ethalfluralin, and fluchloralin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2259–2369 · show in text ↑

trifluralin · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

pendimethalin · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

trifluralin · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Fluchloralin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.