Paper · 2014 · Vegetos

Refinement of Cost Reduction Technology in Sugarcane Micro propagation

J Rastogi; N N Tiwari; R N Pandey; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the present study, an efficient ex-vitro rooting technique was developed for sugarcane commercial cultivar CoS 96268 based on the assessment of several factors. Axillary bud cultures of nodal segments were used in this experiment. The parameters optimized for ex vitro rooting includes the effects of auxin concentration, propagule size, shoot size, duration of auxin pulse treatment, sucrose concentration in multiplication medium, ex-vitro rooting medium were studied. The results showed that the auxin concentration @ 20 mg/l gave maximum rooting percentage. Among 0h, 6h,12h and 24h treatment duration with auxin, 24h treatment duration developed better roots. 90 to 95% rooting was observed in three shoot propagule with 5 to 6 cm length of in vitro micro shoots. It has been observed that sucrose concentration in multiplication medium also influenced the ex vitro rooting. Sucrose at 45 g/l gave good results. Sand was best rooting medium among the peat, peat + soil and vermiculite for the development of ex vitro roots in green house conditions. Ex vitro rooted plants were transplanted in field and 9098% survival percent was found same as in vitro propagated plants of sugarcane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An auxin concentration of 20 mg/l gave the maximum rooting percentage.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoS 96268e0
Treatment
auxin concentration @ 20 mg/le1
Outcome
rooting percentagee1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“an efficient ex-vitro rooting technique was developed for sugarcane commercial cultivar CoS 96268”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“the auxin concentration @ 20 mg/l gave maximum rooting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 24 h auxin treatment duration developed better roots than 0, 6 or 12 h.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoS 96268e0
Treatment
24h treatment duration with auxine1
Outcome
rootse1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
0h, 6h,12he1

Verbatim

e0

“an efficient ex-vitro rooting technique was developed for sugarcane commercial cultivar CoS 96268”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among 0h, 6h,12h and 24h treatment duration with auxin, 24h treatment duration developed better roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting of 90 to 95% was observed in three-shoot propagules with 5 to 6 cm in vitro micro shoots.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoS 96268e0
Outcome
rootinge1
Value
90 to 95%e1
Qualifier
three shoot propagule with 5 to 6 cm length of in vitro micro shootse1

Verbatim

e0

“an efficient ex-vitro rooting technique was developed for sugarcane commercial cultivar CoS 96268”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“90 to 95% rooting was observed in three shoot propagule with 5 to 6 cm length of in vitro micro shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose at 45 g/l in the multiplication medium gave good ex vitro rooting results.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoS 96268e0
Treatment
Sucrose at 45 g/le1
Outcome
ex vitro rootinge2
Direction
good resultse1
Value
45 g/le1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“an efficient ex-vitro rooting technique was developed for sugarcane commercial cultivar CoS 96268”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sucrose at 45 g/l gave good results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–918 · show in text ↑
e2

“sucrose concentration in multiplication medium also influenced the ex vitro rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand was the best rooting medium for ex vitro root development in greenhouse conditions, better than peat, peat + soil and vermiculite.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoS 96268e0
Treatment
Sande1
Outcome
development of ex vitro rootse1
Direction
beste1
Comparator
peat, peat + soil and vermiculitee1
Setting
green house conditionse1

Verbatim

e0

“an efficient ex-vitro rooting technique was developed for sugarcane commercial cultivar CoS 96268”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sand was best rooting medium among the peat, peat + soil and vermiculite for the development of ex vitro roots in green house conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1056 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ex vitro rooted plants transplanted in the field had 9098% survival, the same as in vitro propagated plants.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
survival percente1
Direction
samee1
Value
9098%e1
Comparator
in vitro propagated plantse1
Setting
in fielde1

Verbatim

e0

“an efficient ex-vitro rooting technique was developed for sugarcane commercial cultivar CoS 96268”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ex vitro rooted plants were transplanted in field and 9098% survival percent was found same as in vitro propagated plants of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1192 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

growing medium · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

class · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.