Paper · 1991 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Influence du mode d'utilisation de l'éclairage d'appoint sur la productivité et la physiologie de la tomate de serre

François Vézina; Marc J. Trudel; André Gosselin

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum 'Vedettos') were submitted to 10 light treatments obtained by modifying the supplemental photosynthetic photon flux (FPP) (0, 100, 150 μmol m −2 s −1 ), the photoperiod (natural, 14 h, 17 h, 20 h, 24 h) and the light distribution mode (one or two dark periods). Supplemental light was supplied by high-pressure vapor sodium lamps (HPS). Our results showed that supplemental lighting at a level of 150 μmol m −2 s −1 (PAR) helped to maintain a weekly yield of over 1 kg m −2 during November, December and January. Prolongation of the photoperiod over 14 h did not increase the yield. Plants exposed to continuous lighting were damaged even if they had been previously exposed to long photoperiods (17 and 20 h). For photoperiods of 17 and 20 h, lighting during the night which generated two dark periods per day damaged the plants and reduced the yields. Key words: Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), greenhouse, supplemental lighting, continuous lighting, yield, physiological disorders

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental lighting of 150 μmol m −2 s −1 (PAR) helped maintain a weekly tomato yield of over 1 kg m −2 during November, December and January.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
Material
Vedettose0
Treatment
supplemental lighting at a level of 150 μmol m −2 s −1 (PAR)e1
Outcome
weekly yielde1
Direction
maintaine1
Value
over 1 kg m −2e1
Setting
November, December and Januarye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum 'Vedettos')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“supplemental lighting at a level of 150 μmol m −2 s −1 (PAR) helped to maintain a weekly yield of over 1 kg m −2 during November, December and January”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonging the photoperiod over 14 h did not increase tomato yield.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
Material
Vedettose0
Treatment
Prolongation of the photoperiod over 14 he2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
did not increasee2
Comparator
14 he2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum 'Vedettos')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“Prolongation of the photoperiod over 14 h did not increase the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–620 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous lighting damaged tomato plants even after earlier exposure to long photoperiods of 17 and 20 h.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
continuous lightinge3
Outcome
damagede3
Qualifier
even if they had been previously exposed to long photoperiods (17 and 20 h)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum 'Vedettos')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plants exposed to continuous lighting were damaged even if they had been previously exposed to long photoperiods (17 and 20 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–748 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Night lighting that generated two dark periods per day damaged tomato plants at photoperiods of 17 and 20 h.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
lighting during the night which generated two dark periods per daye4
Outcome
damaged the plantse4
Qualifier
photoperiods of 17 and 20 he4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum 'Vedettos')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“For photoperiods of 17 and 20 h, lighting during the night which generated two dark periods per day damaged the plants and reduced the yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Night lighting that generated two dark periods per day reduced tomato yields at photoperiods of 17 and 20 h.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
lighting during the night which generated two dark periods per daye4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
photoperiods of 17 and 20 he4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum 'Vedettos')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“For photoperiods of 17 and 20 h, lighting during the night which generated two dark periods per day damaged the plants and reduced the yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–891 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 85 positive, 20 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.