Paper · 2000 · Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Integrated Management of Root-knot Disease of Tomato

Hafeez Ullah Khan; Riaz Ahmad; M. Aslam Khan; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Integrated disease control experiments, revealed that with the increase in disease control operations, the disease incidence decreased gradually. The best control of root knot disease was achieved 85.34% over control in treatments of combination of sterilized soil with formalise, organic soil amendments, planting of nursery plants after dipping in 0.1% solution of Tenekil and use of antagonists in soil. All other treatments applied separately showed less effective results, than the integrated treatment application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-knot disease incidence in tomato decreased gradually as disease control operations increased.

Treatment
increase in disease control operationse1
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Management of Root-knot Disease of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the increase in disease control operations, the disease incidence decreased gradually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated combination of sterilized soil, organic amendments, dipped nursery plants and soil antagonists gave 85.34% control of root-knot disease in tomato over control.

Treatment
combination of sterilized soil with formalise, organic soil amendments, planting of nursery plants after dipping in 0.1% solution of Tenekil and use of antagonists in soile2
Outcome
control of root knot diseasee2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
85.34%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Management of Root-knot Disease of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“The best control of root knot disease was achieved 85.34% over control in treatments of combination of sterilized soil with formalise, organic soil amendments, planting of nursery plants after dipping in 0.1% solution of Tenekil and use of antagonists in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other treatments applied separately were less effective than the integrated treatment application against root-knot disease in tomato.

Treatment
other treatments applied separatelye3
Outcome
effective resultse3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
integrated treatment applicatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Management of Root-knot Disease of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“All other treatments applied separately showed less effective results, than the integrated treatment application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–519 · show in text ↑

application · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

other · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

biocontrol · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.