Paper · 2019 · Plant Disease

Synergistic Effect of Combined Application of a New Fungicide Fluopimomide with a Biocontrol Agent Bacillus methylotrophicus TA-1 for Management of Gray Mold in Tomato

Xiaoxue Ji; Jingjing Li; Zhen Meng; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
56
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea can be a severe disease of tomato infecting leaves and fruits of tomato plants. Chemical control is currently the most effective and reliable method; however, application of fungicides has many drawbacks. The combination of biological control agents with newly developed fungicides may be a practicable method to control B. cinerea. Fluopimomide is a newly developed fungicide with a novel mode of action. Bacillus methylotrophicus TA-1, isolated from rhizosphere soil of tomato, is a bacterial strain with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activities. Little information is currently available about the effect of fluopimomide and its integrated effect on B. cinerea. Therefore, laboratory, pot, and field experiments were carried out to determine the effects of fluopimomide alone and in combination with B. methylotrophicus TA-1 against gray mold on tomato. The in vitro growth of B. methylotrophicus TA-1 was unaffected by 100 mg liter −1 fluopimomide. Inhibition of B. cinerea mycelial growth was significantly increased under combined treatment of fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1. In greenhouse experiments, efficacy against gray mold was significantly greater by an integration of fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1 than by either alone; control efficacy of fluopimomide at 50 and 100 g ha −1 in combination with B. methylotrophicus TA-1 at 10 8 colony-forming units (cfu) ml −1 reached 70.16 and 69.32%, respectively, compared with the untreated control. In both field trials during 2017 and 2018, control efficacy was significantly higher for the combination of fluopimomide at 50 and 100 g ha −1 in combination with B. methylotrophicus TA-1 than for either treatment alone. The results from this study indicated that integration of the new fungicide fluopimomide with the biocontrol agent B. methylotrophicus TA-1 synergistically increased control efficacy of the fungicide against gray mold of tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluopimomide at 50 and 100 g/ha combined with B. methylotrophicus TA-1 gave 70.16 and 69.32% control efficacy against gray mold relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
fluopimomide at 50 and 100 g ha −1 in combination with B. methylotrophicus TA-1e1
Outcome
control efficacye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
70.16 and 69.32%e1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 161–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“control efficacy of fluopimomide at 50 and 100 g ha −1 in combination with B. methylotrophicus TA-1 at 10 8 colony-forming units (cfu) ml −1 reached 70.16 and 69.32%, respectively, compared with the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse experiments, the combination of fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1 gave significantly greater efficacy against gray mold than either agent alone.

Treatment
integration of fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1e2
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
efficacy against gray molde2
Direction
significantly greatere2
Comparator
either alonee2
Setting
greenhouse experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 161–167 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea can be a severe disease of tomato infecting leaves and fruits of tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
e2

“In greenhouse experiments, efficacy against gray mold was significantly greater by an integration of fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1 than by either alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integration of fluopimomide with B. methylotrophicus TA-1 synergistically increased control efficacy of fluopimomide against tomato gray mold.

Treatment
integration of the new fungicide fluopimomide with the biocontrol agent B. methylotrophicus TA-1e7
Outcome
control efficacye7
Direction
synergistically increasede7
Comparator
the fungicidee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 161–167 · show in text ↑
e7

“integration of the new fungicide fluopimomide with the biocontrol agent B. methylotrophicus TA-1 synergistically increased control efficacy of the fungicide against gray mold of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In field trials in 2017 and 2018, the combination of fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1 gave significantly higher control efficacy than either treatment alone.

Treatment
combination of fluopimomide at 50 and 100 g ha −1 in combination with B. methylotrophicus TA-1e6
Outcome
control efficacye6
Direction
significantly highere6
Comparator
either treatment alonee6
Setting
field trials during 2017 and 2018e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 161–167 · show in text ↑
e6

“In both field trials during 2017 and 2018, control efficacy was significantly higher for the combination of fluopimomide at 50 and 100 g ha −1 in combination with B. methylotrophicus TA-1 than for either treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of B. methylotrophicus TA-1 in vitro was unaffected by 100 mg/liter fluopimomide.

Treatment
100 mg liter −1 fluopimomidee7
Interactor
B. methylotrophicus TA-1Bacillus velezensise7biocontrol_agent
Outcome
in vitro growth of B. methylotrophicus TA-1e7
Direction
unaffectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 161–167 · show in text ↑
e7

“The in vitro growth of B. methylotrophicus TA-1 was unaffected by 100 mg liter −1 fluopimomide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1 significantly increased inhibition of B. cinerea mycelial growth.

Treatment
combined treatment of fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1e4
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae4pathogen
Second interactor
B. methylotrophicus TA-1Bacillus velezensise4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Inhibition of B. cinerea mycelial growthe4
Direction
significantly increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 161–167 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inhibition of B. cinerea mycelial growth was significantly increased under combined treatment of fluopimomide and B. methylotrophicus TA-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1132 · show in text ↑

Bacillus velezensis · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

biocontrol · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.