Abstract
Two varieties of tomato were sown to determine the effect of NPK on tomato plants by using them independently under normal field conditions. Application of urea delayed flowering and fruit setting in both the varieties, but increased the number of fruit set, weight of fruits harvested per plant, weight of individual fruits and fruit yield/ha. Muriate of potash and controlled treatments did not have significant influence on yield components. Super phosphate treatment, however, gave better results then potash and controlled treatments for number of fruits set, and harvested fruit weight/plant and average weight/fruit and yield/ha. The average yield of Roma was significantly higher than that of Moneymaker in urea and super phosphate plots.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Urea delayed flowering in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- Application of ureae1
- Outcome
- floweringe1
- Direction
- delayede1
- Setting
- normal field conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two varieties of tomato were sown to determine the effect of NPK on tomato plants by using them independently under normal field conditions”
e1“Application of urea delayed flowering and fruit setting in both the varieties, but increased the number of fruit set, weight of fruits harvested per plant, weight of individual fruits and fruit yield/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea increased the number of fruit set, weight of fruits harvested per plant and weight of individual fruits in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Application of ureae1
- Outcome
- number of fruit set, weight of fruits harvested per plant, weight of individual fruitse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- normal field conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two varieties of tomato were sown to determine the effect of NPK on tomato plants by using them independently under normal field conditions”
e1“Application of urea delayed flowering and fruit setting in both the varieties, but increased the number of fruit set, weight of fruits harvested per plant, weight of individual fruits and fruit yield/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea increased tomato fruit yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Application of ureae1
- Outcome
- fruit yield/hae1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- normal field conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two varieties of tomato were sown to determine the effect of NPK on tomato plants by using them independently under normal field conditions”
e1“Application of urea delayed flowering and fruit setting in both the varieties, but increased the number of fruit set, weight of fruits harvested per plant, weight of individual fruits and fruit yield/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Muriate of potash and controlled treatments had no significant influence on tomato yield components.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Muriate of potashe2
- Outcome
- yield componentse2
- Direction
- did not have significant influencee2
- Comparator
- controlled treatmentse2
- Setting
- normal field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two varieties of tomato were sown to determine the effect of NPK on tomato plants by using them independently under normal field conditions”
e2“Muriate of potash and controlled treatments did not have significant influence on yield components.”
Claim · model-written summary
Super phosphate gave better number of fruits set, harvested fruit weight per plant and average fruit weight in tomato than potash and controlled treatments.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Super phosphate treatmente3
- Outcome
- number of fruits set, and harvested fruit weight/plant and average weight/fruite3
- Direction
- better resultse3
- Comparator
- potash and controlled treatmentse3
- Setting
- normal field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two varieties of tomato were sown to determine the effect of NPK on tomato plants by using them independently under normal field conditions”
e3“Super phosphate treatment, however, gave better results then potash and controlled treatments for number of fruits set, and harvested fruit weight/plant and average weight/fruit and yield/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Super phosphate gave better tomato yield per hectare than potash and controlled treatments.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Super phosphate treatmente3
- Outcome
- yield/hae3
- Direction
- better resultse3
- Comparator
- potash and controlled treatmentse3
- Setting
- normal field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two varieties of tomato were sown to determine the effect of NPK on tomato plants by using them independently under normal field conditions”
e3“Super phosphate treatment, however, gave better results then potash and controlled treatments for number of fruits set, and harvested fruit weight/plant and average weight/fruit and yield/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
The Roma tomato variety yielded significantly higher than Moneymaker in urea and super phosphate plots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Material
- Romae4
- Treatment
- urea and super phosphate plotse4
- Outcome
- average yielde4
- Direction
- highere4
- Comparator
- Moneymakere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two varieties of tomato were sown to determine the effect of NPK on tomato plants by using them independently under normal field conditions”
e4“The average yield of Roma was significantly higher than that of Moneymaker in urea and super phosphate plots.”
The same questions in other papers
potassium chloride · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →phosphorus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
97 papers more in this group
See all 101 papers →nitrogen · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →nitrogen · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
206 papers more in this group
See all 210 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.