Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhization on Fruit Quality in Industrialized Tomato Production

Ramona Schubert; Stephanie Werner; Hillary Cirka; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
37
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Industrialized tomato production faces a decrease in flavors and nutritional value due to conventional breeding. Moreover, tomato production heavily relies on nitrogen and phosphate fertilization. Phosphate uptake and improvement of fruit quality by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are well-studied. We addressed the question of whether commercially used tomato cultivars grown in a hydroponic system can be mycorrhizal, leading to improved fruit quality. Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis were grown under different phosphate concentrations and in substrates used in industrial tomato production. Changes in fruit gene expression and metabolite levels were checked by RNAseq and metabolite determination, respectively. The tests revealed that reduction of phosphate to 80% and use of mixed substrate allow AM establishment without affecting yield. By comparing green fruits from non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal plants, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found to possibly be involved in processes regulating fruit maturation and nutrition. Red fruits from mycorrhizal plants showed a trend of higher BRIX values and increased levels of carotenoids in comparison to those from non-mycorrhizal plants. Free amino acids exhibited up to four times higher levels in red fruits due to AM, showing the potential of mycorrhization to increase the nutritional value of tomatoes in industrialized production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced phosphate to 80% allowed AM establishment.

Treatment
reduction of phosphate to 80%e0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise1symbiont
Outcome
AM establishmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tests revealed that reduction of phosphate to 80% and use of mixed substrate allow AM establishment without affecting yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis were grown under different phosphate concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed substrate allowed AM establishment.

Treatment
use of mixed substratee0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise1symbiont
Outcome
AM establishmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tests revealed that reduction of phosphate to 80% and use of mixed substrate allow AM establishment without affecting yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis were grown under different phosphate concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

reduction of phosphate to 80% did not affect tomato yield.

Treatment
reduction of phosphate to 80%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tests revealed that reduction of phosphate to 80% and use of mixed substrate allow AM establishment without affecting yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis were grown under different phosphate concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

use of mixed substrate did not affect tomato yield.

Treatment
use of mixed substratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tests revealed that reduction of phosphate to 80% and use of mixed substrate allow AM establishment without affecting yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis were grown under different phosphate concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–563 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green fruits of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants had differentially expressed genes possibly involved in maturation and nutrition.

Organ / stage
green fruitse0
Gene
differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Outcome
differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Qualifier
possibly be involved in processes regulating fruit maturation and nutritione0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By comparing green fruits from non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal plants, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found to possibly be involved in processes regulating fruit maturation and nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal red fruits had higher BRIX values than non-mycorrhizal fruits.

Organ / stage
Red fruitse0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise1symbiont
Outcome
BRIX valuese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
trende0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red fruits from mycorrhizal plants showed a trend of higher BRIX values and increased levels of carotenoids in comparison to those from non-mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1230 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal red fruits had increased levels of carotenoids than non-mycorrhizal fruits.

Organ / stage
Red fruitse0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise1symbiont
Outcome
levels of carotenoidse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red fruits from mycorrhizal plants showed a trend of higher BRIX values and increased levels of carotenoids in comparison to those from non-mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1230 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM red fruits had up to four times higher free amino acid levels.

Organ / stage
red fruitse0
Treatment
AMe0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise1symbiont
Outcome
Free amino acidse0
Direction
highere0
Value
up to four timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Free amino acids exhibited up to four times higher levels in red fruits due to AM, showing the potential of mycorrhization to increase the nutritional value of tomatoes in industrialized production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–511 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

101 papers: 80 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus irregularis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.