Paper · 1971 · Agronomy Journal

Response of ‘Atlas’ Cotton to Variations in Plants Per Hill and Within‐Row Spacings1

B. S. Hawkins; H. A. Peacock

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract To determine the effects of variations in plants per hill, spacing arrangements, and plant populations on agronomic and fiber properties of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) we conducted a 2‐year study at Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton on Cecil scl. Each trial was a randomized block split‐plot with number of plants (2, 3, 4, or 5 per hill) as the main plots and within‐row spacings (20, 40, and 60 cm) as subplots. The variations in plants/ hill and spacings represent a range in population of 32,110 to 240,825 plants/hectare. Significant differences in yield due to years and to within‐row spacings were found, but number of plants per hill did not affect yield. The plants in hills spaced 20 and 40 cm apart produced higher yields than the plants spaced 60 cm. A population range of 96,330 to 144,495 plants/ha produced best yields. We found differences in lint percentage and boll size due to years, plants/hill, and within‐row spacings. Lint percentage was highest and bolls were largest from plants at the 60‐cm spacing and when there were 2 plants/hill. The only significant difference in seed size was that associated with years. Fiber length differences were due to years, plants/hill, and within‐row spacings; the longest fibers were produced by 3 plants/hill and by plants at 40‐cm spacing. Differences in fiber strength were due to years and within‐row spacings; the strongest fibers were produced by plants spaced 60 cm apart. Fiber fineness was influenced by years only. The following interactions were found: Years × plants/hill: boll size, fiber length, fiber fineness, yield, lint percentage, and seed size. Years × spacings: lint percentage, boll size, and fiber fineness. Plants/hill × spacings: lint percentage. There were no significant second order interactions. Although mean differences were statistically significant, they are so small that they may be of no practical value. However, results demonstrate the relative stability of the characters stodied over a wide range of planting patterns and population densities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differed significantly among years and within-row spacings of Atlas cotton.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
within‐row spacingse1
Outcome
yielde1
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences in yield due to years and to within‐row spacings were found, but number of plants per hill did not affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–679 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of plants per hill did not affect yield of Atlas cotton.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
number of plants per hille1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences in yield due to years and to within‐row spacings were found, but number of plants per hill did not affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants in hills spaced 20 and 40 cm apart produced higher yields than plants spaced 60 cm apart.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
hills spaced 20 and 40 cm aparte2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
the plants spaced 60 cme2
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants in hills spaced 20 and 40 cm apart produced higher yields than the plants spaced 60 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–778 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A population of 96,330 to 144,495 plants/ha produced the best yields of Atlas cotton.

Material
Atlase0
Outcome
yieldse3
Value
96,330 to 144,495 plants/hae3
Qualifier
best yieldse3
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e3

“A population range of 96,330 to 144,495 plants/ha produced best yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint percentage was highest at 60-cm spacing with two plants per hill.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
60‐cm spacinge4
Outcome
Lint percentagee4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lint percentage was highest and bolls were largest from plants at the 60‐cm spacing and when there were 2 plants/hill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bolls of Atlas cotton were largest at 60-cm spacing with two plants per hill.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
60‐cm spacinge4
Outcome
bollse4
Direction
largeste4
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lint percentage was highest and bolls were largest from plants at the 60‐cm spacing and when there were 2 plants/hill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The longest fibers of Atlas cotton were produced by 3 plants per hill and by 40-cm spacing.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
3 plants/hille5
Outcome
fiberse5
Direction
longeste5
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e5

“the longest fibers were produced by 3 plants/hill and by plants at 40‐cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strongest fibers of Atlas cotton were produced by plants spaced 60 cm apart.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
plants spaced 60 cm aparte6
Outcome
fiberse6
Direction
strongeste6
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e6

“the strongest fibers were produced by plants spaced 60 cm apart”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1454 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber fineness of Atlas cotton was influenced by years only.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
yearse7
Outcome
Fiber finenesse7
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e7

“Fiber fineness was influenced by years only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1499 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-way interactions of years with plants per hill, spacing and yield-related traits were significant for cotton.

Material
Atlase0
Outcome
interactionse7
Qualifier
Years × plants/hill: boll size, fiber length, fiber fineness, yield, lint percentage, and seed sizee7
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e7

“The following interactions were found: Years × plants/hill: boll size, fiber length, fiber fineness, yield, lint percentage, and seed size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1639 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no significant second-order interactions among years, plants per hill and spacing in cotton.

Outcome
second order interactionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e7

“There were no significant second order interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1799 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean differences among planting patterns were statistically significant but may be of no practical value.

Material
Atlase0
Outcome
mean differencese7
Qualifier
so small that they may be of no practical valuee7
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e7

“Although mean differences were statistically significant, they are so small that they may be of no practical value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1915 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Characters of Atlas cotton are relatively stable over a wide range of planting patterns and population densities.

Material
Atlase0
Outcome
relative stability of the characterse7
Qualifier
over a wide range of planting patterns and population densitiese7
Setting
Experiment, Ga.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment, Ga., using ‘Atlas’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–249 · show in text ↑
e7

“results demonstrate the relative stability of the characters stodied over a wide range of planting patterns and population densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2058 · show in text ↑

density · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 34 positive, 35 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.