Paper · 2021 · Journal of Applied Life Sciences and Environment

PLANT SPACING AND ITS EFFECT ON YIELD, FIBRE QUALITY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN COTTON

Rojda Altundag; Emine Karademir

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to see how changing plant spacings affected cotton yield, yield components, fibre quality traits, and physiological parameters. In this study, six plant spacings (no thinning, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm) were investigated. Plant density caused significant differences in the number of first fruiting branches, number of bolls, ginning percentage, seed cotton yield, fibre yield, and normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI). Plant height, the number of sympodial branches, number of monopodial branches, boll weight, seed cotton weight/boll, number of 100-seed weight, seeds/boll, canopy temperature, chlorophyll content, leaf area, and fibre quality properties (micronaire, length, strength, elongation, uniformity, short fibre index, reflectance, yellowness, and spinning consistency index [SCI] were non-significant. The highest values of seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentage, number of first fruiting branches, and NDVI were obtained in the no thinning and 5 cm plant spacing applications, while the highest boll number was obtained at 20 and 25 cm plant spacings. In this study, physiological parameters, such as canopy temperature, leaf area, chlorophyll content, and fibre technological traits, were not affected by plant spacing. The highest seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentage and NDVI were obtained from no thinning and 5 cm intra-row spacing, indicating their impact on examined characteristics. Therefore, a yield estimation can be made in the flowering period with the NDVI in different plant densities in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected number of first fruiting branches.

Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
number of first fruiting branchese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant density caused significant differences in the number of first fruiting branches, number of bolls, ginning percentage, seed cotton yield, fibre yield, and normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected number of bolls.

Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
number of bollse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant density caused significant differences in the number of first fruiting branches, number of bolls, ginning percentage, seed cotton yield, fibre yield, and normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected ginning percentage.

Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
ginning percentagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant density caused significant differences in the number of first fruiting branches, number of bolls, ginning percentage, seed cotton yield, fibre yield, and normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected seed cotton yield.

Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant density caused significant differences in the number of first fruiting branches, number of bolls, ginning percentage, seed cotton yield, fibre yield, and normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected fibre yield.

Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
fibre yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant density caused significant differences in the number of first fruiting branches, number of bolls, ginning percentage, seed cotton yield, fibre yield, and normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI).

Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant density caused significant differences in the number of first fruiting branches, number of bolls, ginning percentage, seed cotton yield, fibre yield, and normalised difference vegetative index (NDVI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing had a non-significant effect on Plant height, the number of sympodial branches, number of monopodial branches.

Treatment
plant spacinge1
Outcome
Plant height, the number of sympodial branches, number of monopodial branchese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, the number of sympodial branches, number of monopodial branches, boll weight, seed cotton weight/boll, number of 100-seed weight, seeds/boll, canopy temperature, chlorophyll content, leaf area, and fibre quality properties (micronaire, length, strength, elongation, uniformity, short fibre index, reflectance, yellowness, and spinning consistency index [SCI] were non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest values of seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentage, number of first fruiting branches, and NDVI were obtained in the no thinning and 5 cm plant spacing applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing had a non-significant effect on boll weight, seed cotton weight/boll, number of 100-seed weight.

Treatment
plant spacinge1
Outcome
boll weight, seed cotton weight/boll, number of 100-seed weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, the number of sympodial branches, number of monopodial branches, boll weight, seed cotton weight/boll, number of 100-seed weight, seeds/boll, canopy temperature, chlorophyll content, leaf area, and fibre quality properties (micronaire, length, strength, elongation, uniformity, short fibre index, reflectance, yellowness, and spinning consistency index [SCI] were non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest values of seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentage, number of first fruiting branches, and NDVI were obtained in the no thinning and 5 cm plant spacing applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing had a non-significant effect on seeds/boll, canopy temperature, chlorophyll content.

Treatment
plant spacinge1
Outcome
seeds/boll, canopy temperature, chlorophyll contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, the number of sympodial branches, number of monopodial branches, boll weight, seed cotton weight/boll, number of 100-seed weight, seeds/boll, canopy temperature, chlorophyll content, leaf area, and fibre quality properties (micronaire, length, strength, elongation, uniformity, short fibre index, reflectance, yellowness, and spinning consistency index [SCI] were non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest values of seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentage, number of first fruiting branches, and NDVI were obtained in the no thinning and 5 cm plant spacing applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing had a non-significant effect on leaf area, and fibre quality properties.

Treatment
plant spacinge1
Outcome
leaf area, and fibre quality propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, the number of sympodial branches, number of monopodial branches, boll weight, seed cotton weight/boll, number of 100-seed weight, seeds/boll, canopy temperature, chlorophyll content, leaf area, and fibre quality properties (micronaire, length, strength, elongation, uniformity, short fibre index, reflectance, yellowness, and spinning consistency index [SCI] were non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest values of seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentage, number of first fruiting branches, and NDVI were obtained in the no thinning and 5 cm plant spacing applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No thinning and 5 cm spacing gave the highest seed cotton yield, fibre yield, and ginning percentage.

Treatment
no thinning and 5 cm plant spacinge0
Outcome
seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentage, number of first fruiting branches, and NDVI were obtained in the no thinning and 5 cm plant spacing applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No thinning and 5 cm spacing gave the highest first fruiting branches and NDVI.

Treatment
no thinning and 5 cm plant spacinge0
Outcome
number of first fruiting branches, and NDVIe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of seed cotton yield, fibre yield, ginning percentage, number of first fruiting branches, and NDVI were obtained in the no thinning and 5 cm plant spacing applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest boll number occurred at 20 and 25 cm spacing.

Treatment
20 and 25 cm plant spacingse0
Outcome
boll numbere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest boll number was obtained at 20 and 25 cm plant spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI in the flowering period can estimate cotton yield across plant densities.

Outcome
yield estimatione0
Qualifier
flowering periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a yield estimation can be made in the flowering period with the NDVI in different plant densities in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1587 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

pruning · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 15 positive, 16 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

density · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 34 positive, 35 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.