Paper · 2023 · Menoufia Journal of Plant Production

EEFFECT OF PLANTING SPACES AND TOPPING TIME ON PRODUCTIVITY OF COTTON VARIETY SUPER GIZA 97

shimaa elsayed; Azza A. El-Hendawy,

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out in 2021 season and repeated in 2022 season at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt to assess the effect of using hill spacing and topping time in addition to their interactions on productivity and quality of cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.). The experimental design was a split-plot with 3 replicates. The main plots were devoted to hill spacing (25, 30 and 35 cm), whereas plant topping time (no topping, manual topping at the formation of 12, 14 and 16 fruiting branches/plant) was allocated in the sub-plots. Data indicated that the widder hill spacing (35 cm) significantly increased total bolls number set/plant and bolls setting%, yield of seed cotton per feddan and its contributory characters as well as fiber length. However, plant height, bolls shedding% and the number of actual plants per feddan at harvest in both seasons were decreased. No topping treatment gave a significant excess in the final plant height and sympodia number/plant in the two seasons of study. Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plant gave a significant decrease in bolls shedding% and significant increase in numbers of total fruiting points and total bolls set/plant and bolls setting%, yield of seed cotton per feddan and its contributory characters in the two seasons in addition to length in the first season. Sowing cotton at 35 cm between plants interacted with topping cotton plants just after the formation of 16 fruiting branches gave the best results. It could be advised to apply this interaction treatment under Sakha region, to increase cotton productivity of cotton cultivar Super Giza 97.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 35 cm hill spacing increased total bolls set per plant and bolls setting percentage.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
hill spacing (35 cm)e1
Outcome
total bolls number set/plant and bolls setting%e1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“the widder hill spacing (35 cm) significantly increased total bolls number set/plant and bolls setting%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 35 cm hill spacing increased seed cotton yield per feddan and contributory characters.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
hill spacing (35 cm)e1
Outcome
yield of seed cotton per feddan and its contributory characterse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“the widder hill spacing (35 cm) significantly increased total bolls number set/plant and bolls setting%, yield of seed cotton per feddan and its contributory characters as well as fiber length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 35 cm hill spacing increased fiber length.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
hill spacing (35 cm)e1
Outcome
fiber lengthe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“the widder hill spacing (35 cm) significantly increased total bolls number set/plant and bolls setting%, yield of seed cotton per feddan and its contributory characters as well as fiber length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 35 cm hill spacing decreased plant height, boll shedding percentage and actual plants per feddan at harvest.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
hill spacing (35 cm)e2
Outcome
plant height, bolls shedding% and the number of actual plants per feddan at harveste1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
both seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height, bolls shedding% and the number of actual plants per feddan at harvest in both seasons were decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–942 · show in text ↑
e2

“the widder hill spacing (35 cm) significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No topping increased final plant height and sympodia number per plant.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
No topping treatmente1
Outcome
final plant height and sympodia number/plante1
Direction
excesse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“No topping treatment gave a significant excess in the final plant height and sympodia number/plant in the two seasons of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping after 16 fruiting branches formed decreased boll shedding percentage.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plante1
Outcome
bolls shedding%e1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plant gave a significant decrease in bolls shedding%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping after 16 fruiting branches formed increased fruiting points, bolls set and boll setting percentage.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plante1
Outcome
numbers of total fruiting points and total bolls set/plant and bolls setting%e1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plant gave a significant decrease in bolls shedding% and significant increase in numbers of total fruiting points and total bolls set/plant and bolls setting%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping after 16 fruiting branches formed increased seed cotton yield and contributory characters.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plante2
Outcome
yield of seed cotton per feddan and its contributory characterse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant increase in numbers of total fruiting points and total bolls set/plant and bolls setting%, yield of seed cotton per feddan and its contributory characters in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1366 · show in text ↑
e2

“Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping after 16 fruiting branches formed increased length in the first season.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plante1
Outcome
lengthe1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
first seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“Topping when 16 fruiting branches were formed on the plant gave a significant decrease in bolls shedding% and significant increase in numbers of total fruiting points and total bolls set/plant and bolls setting%, yield of seed cotton per feddan and its contributory characters in the two seasons in addition to length in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing cotton at 35 cm and topping after 16 fruiting branches gave the best results.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Sowing cotton at 35 cm between plants interacted with topping cotton plants just after the formation of 16 fruiting branchese1
Outcome
best resultse1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sowing cotton at 35 cm between plants interacted with topping cotton plants just after the formation of 16 fruiting branches gave the best results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1557 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advised 35 cm spacing with topping after 16 fruiting branches to increase Super Giza 97 productivity in Sakha.

Taxon
cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)Gossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
apply this interaction treatmente1
Setting
Sakha regione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton cultivar Super Giza 97 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“It could be advised to apply this interaction treatment under Sakha region, to increase cotton productivity of cotton cultivar Super Giza 97.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1699 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 49 positive, 27 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

pruning · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

density · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 34 positive, 35 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.