Paper · 2012 · Acta Agrobotanica

Weed infestation of spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in monoculture depending on the cover crop and weed control method

Dorota Gawęda; Cezary A. Kwiatkowski

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this 3-year field study was to evaluate the effect of some stubble crops and in-crop weed control methods on the species composition, number and air-dry weight of weeds in a wheat crop grown in short-term monoculture. The study was conducted in the period 2009-2011 in the Uhrusk Experimental Farm on mixed rendzina soil classified as very good rye soil complex. It included various types of stubble crops ploughed in each year (control treatment without cover crop, white mustard, lacy phacelia, a mixture of legumes – narrow-leaf lupin + field pea) and methods of weed control in spring wheat (mechanical, mechanical and chemical, chemical weed control). On average during the study period, all stubble crops used reduced the air-dry weight of weds in the treatments with mechanical weed management relative to the control treatment. Irrespective of the weed control method, the number of weeds in the wheat crop was significantly lower only after the ploughing in of white mustard. Mechanical weed management proved to be less effective in reducing the number and dry weight of weeds compared to other weed control methods. The white mustard and legume mixture cover crops had a reducing effect on the number of weed species in relation to the treatment without cover crops. The highest floristic diversity of weed communities was found in the spring wheat crop in which only mechanical weeding alone was used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested stubble crops reduced weed air-dry weight under mechanical weed management versus no cover crop.

Taxon
spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
all stubble cropse0
Interactor
wedse0weed
Outcome
air-dry weight of wedse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
mechanical weed managemente0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all stubble crops used reduced the air-dry weight of weds in the treatments with mechanical weed management relative to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White mustard cover crop significantly reduced weed number across weed control methods.

Treatment
ploughing in of white mustarde0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of weedse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of the weed control method, the number of weeds in the wheat crop was significantly lower only after the ploughing in of white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical weed management was less effective at reducing weed number than other methods.

Taxon
spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Mechanical weed managemente0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
numbere0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
other weed control methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical weed management proved to be less effective in reducing the number and dry weight of weeds compared to other weed control methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical weed management was less effective at reducing weed dry weight than other methods.

Taxon
spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Mechanical weed managemente0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
other weed control methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical weed management proved to be less effective in reducing the number and dry weight of weeds compared to other weed control methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White mustard reduced the number of weed species relative to no cover crop.

Taxon
spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
white mustarde0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
number of weed speciese0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
treatment without cover cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The white mustard and legume mixture cover crops had a reducing effect on the number of weed species in relation to the treatment without cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The legume mixture reduced the number of weed species relative to no cover crop.

Taxon
spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
legume mixturee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
number of weed speciese0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
treatment without cover cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The white mustard and legume mixture cover crops had a reducing effect on the number of weed species in relation to the treatment without cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed floristic diversity was highest with mechanical weeding alone.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
mechanical weeding alonee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
floristic diversity of weed communitiese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest floristic diversity of weed communities was found in the spring wheat crop in which only mechanical weeding alone was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1423 · show in text ↑

Sinapis alba · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 362 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.