Paper · 1976 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

NEMATODES IN TOBACCO IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES OF CANADA

J. KIMPINSKI; K. E. LELACHEUR; L. S. THOMPSON; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil and root samples were collected from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) fields in Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick in 1970 and 1972, and also from P.E.I, in 1971 and 1974. Twenty genera of plant and soil nematodes were recovered. The dominant plant-parasitic species were Pratylenchus crenatus Loof, 1960 and P. penetrans (Cobb, 1917) Filipjev and Stek., 1941. These two species were often found in the same sample and were most numerous in P.E.I., though their numbers were lower than had been recorded previously in forage and vegetable surveys. Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood, 1949 was recovered in low numbers from some of the samples. Nematicide treatments usually reduced the number of Pratylenchus spp., but there were no significant increases in yield or quality of tobacco. Laboratory and greenhouse experiments indicated that M. hapla did not invade or reproduce in tobacco roots as quickly as did P. penetrans. Neither species influenced plant growth significantly. It was concluded that plant-parasitic nematodes are riot a major problem in tobacco in the Maritime provinces.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty genera of plant and soil nematodes were recovered from tobacco fields.

Outcome
genera of plant and soil nematodes were recoverede0
Value
Twenty generae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty genera of plant and soil nematodes were recovered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–249 · show in text ↑
t0

“NEMATODES IN TOBACCO IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES OF CANADA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dominant parasitic nematodes were Pratylenchus crenatus and P. penetrans.

Interactor
Pratylenchus crenatus Loof, 1960Pratylenchus crenatuse0pathogen
Outcome
dominant plant-parasitic speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominant plant-parasitic species were Pratylenchus crenatus Loof, 1960 and P. penetrans (Cobb, 1917) Filipjev and Stek., 1941”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–380 · show in text ↑
t0

“NEMATODES IN TOBACCO IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES OF CANADA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meloidogyne hapla occurred at low numbers in some samples.

Interactor
Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood, 1949Meloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood, 1949 was recovered in low numberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood, 1949 was recovered in low numbers from some of the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“NEMATODES IN TOBACCO IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES OF CANADA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide usually reduced Pratylenchus numbers.

Treatment
Nematicide treatmentse0
Interactor
Pratylenchus spp.Pratylenchuse0pathogen
Outcome
number of Pratylenchus spp.e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus
Pratylenchus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematicide treatments usually reduced the number of Pratylenchus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“NEMATODES IN TOBACCO IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES OF CANADA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide did not significantly increase tobacco yield or quality.

Treatment
Nematicide treatmentse1
Outcome
yield or quality of tobaccoe0
Direction
no significant increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant increases in yield or quality of tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–798 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nematicide treatments usually reduced the number of Pratylenchus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–726 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. hapla invaded or reproduced in tobacco roots more slowly than P. penetrans.

Interactor
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
M. hapla did not invade or reproduce in tobacco rootse0
Direction
did note0
Comparator
P. penetranse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. hapla did not invade or reproduce in tobacco roots as quickly as did P. penetrans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither species significantly influenced tobacco plant growth.

Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
Neither species influenced plant growth significantlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither species influenced plant growth significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“NEMATODES IN TOBACCO IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES OF CANADA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑

insecticide · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.