Paper · 1979 · Nematropica

Research Papers: Response of Flue Cured Tobacco to Application of Nematicides

Aka Alla Martin; A. Carrillo; Róger López

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was carried out in Perez Zeledon, Costa Rica, to evaluate the effects of aldicarb, fensulfothion, phenamiphos, two formulations of carbofuran, two of ethoprop and two treatments with oxamyl (one consisted of two foliar applications of the chemical, and the other was a bare-root dip treatment during 10 min), in doses of 5, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 0.65 kg a.i./ha and 1,500 ppm, respectively, on the yield and other variables of flue-cured tobacco, cv. Speight G-28, and on control of nematodes. No significant differences were found between nematicide treatments and control on yield, quality and gross income, although a considerable net profit was obtained with one carbofuran formulation (Furadan) and fensulfothion. Some chemicals significantly reduced the root-knot index caused by Meloidogyne incognita and population densities of this and other nematodes in the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide treatments showed no significant yield difference from the control.

Treatment
nematicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant differences were found between nematicide treatments and control on yield, quality and gross income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide treatments showed no significant tobacco quality difference from the control.

Treatment
nematicide treatmentse0
Outcome
qualitye0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant differences were found between nematicide treatments and control on yield, quality and gross income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide treatments showed no significant gross income difference from the control.

Treatment
nematicide treatmentse0
Outcome
gross incomee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant differences were found between nematicide treatments and control on yield, quality and gross income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One carbofuran formulation, Furadan, produced considerable net profit.

Treatment
one carbofuran formulation (Furadan)e0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
considerablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“a considerable net profit was obtained with one carbofuran formulation (Furadan) and fensulfothion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fensulfothion produced considerable net profit.

Treatment
fensulfothione0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
considerablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“a considerable net profit was obtained with one carbofuran formulation (Furadan) and fensulfothion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Some nematicides significantly reduced the Meloidogyne incognita root-knot index.

Treatment
Some chemicalse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
root-knot indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Some chemicals significantly reduced the root-knot index caused by Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Some nematicides significantly reduced soil population densities of Meloidogyne incognita and other nematodes.

Treatment
Some chemicalse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
population densities of this and other nematodes in the soile0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Some chemicals significantly reduced the root-knot index caused by Meloidogyne incognita and population densities of this and other nematodes in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–883 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fensulfothion · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

insecticide · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.