Paper · 1975 · Nematropica

Other Contrubitions: Effects of Nematicides on the Nematode Populations and Yield of Tobacco

N. D. Singh

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a field experiment, the effects of D-D, DD-MENCS (Vorlex), Ethoprop 6% E.C. and Ethoprop 10% G for the control of plant parasitic nematodes and on yield of tobacco were studied. Nematodes were counted in soil samples taken 54, 114 and 171 days after transplanting. All nematicide treatments significantly reduced Meloidogyne incognita after 54 days but, only D-D and Vorlex were significantly different from the control. Increased yields were harvested from plots treated with nematicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All nematicides reduced Meloidogyne incognita after 54 days.

Treatment
nematicide treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
Meloidogyne incognitae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
after 54 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All nematicide treatments significantly reduced Meloidogyne incognita after 54 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only D-D and Vorlex differed significantly from control in the nematode result.

Treatment
D-D and Vorlexe0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
Meloidogyne incognitae0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All nematicide treatments significantly reduced Meloidogyne incognita after 54 days but, only D-D and Vorlex were significantly different from the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide plots produced increased tobacco yields.

Treatment
nematicidese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased yields were harvested from plots treated with nematicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.