Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nematicide treatments showed no significant yield difference from the control.

A claim from Research Papers: Response of Flue Cured Tobacco to Application of Nematicides · 1979

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide treatments showed no significant yield difference from the control.

Treatment
nematicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47
e0

“No significant differences were found between nematicide treatments and control on yield, quality and gross income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–618

Title

Research Papers: Response of Flue Cured Tobacco to Application of Nematicides

Aka Alla Martin; A. Carrillo; Róger López Nematropica 1979

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-bb74add43f30fc8914046b5f03400f42ca07be4793ba369c8a8d49010e72e748 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

insecticide · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.