Paper · 1973 · EPPO Bulletin

Yield Responses in Relation to the Chemical Control of Root‐knot Nematodes in Southern Italy

F. Lamberti

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nematicide trials have been conducted in Southern Italy to determine the yield response of tobacco, tomato and egg‐plant. The nematode species involved were mainly Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood and M. arenaria (Neal) Chitwood. Many nematicides have an impact also on other soil pathogens or even on insects, so that the yied increase observed in the field has to be considered as a combined effect. On tobacco, most of the nematicides gave positive results, but it appeared that there might be important differences according to the variety considered. In certain tomato fields, which had not been specially attacked by Meloidogyne, the positive effects seemed to be also due to the insecticidal or fungicidal effect of the chemicals. No statistically significant yield increases were, however, obtained on treated egg‐plant fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most nematicides gave positive yield results for tobacco, with apparent variety differences.

Treatment
most of the nematicidese0
Outcome
yield responsee1
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
important differences according to the variety considerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On tobacco, most of the nematicides gave positive results, but it appeared that there might be important differences according to the variety considered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield response of tobacco, tomato and egg‐plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some tomato fields without special Meloidogyne attack, chemicals had positive effects that may also reflect insecticidal or fungicidal action.

Treatment
chemicalse0
Interactor
MeloidogyneMeloidogynee0pathogen
Outcome
yield responsee1
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
insecticidal or fungicidal effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In certain tomato fields, which had not been specially attacked by Meloidogyne, the positive effects seemed to be also due to the insecticidal or fungicidal effect of the chemicals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–761 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield response of tobacco, tomato and egg‐plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide-treated egg-plant fields had no statistically significant yield increase.

Taxon
egg‐plantSolanum melongenae0
Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No statistically significant yield increases were, however, obtained on treated egg‐plant fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–859 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.