Paper · 2010 · African Crop Science Journal

Sustainable crop production on aeolian sandy semi-arid soils in South Africa

ATP Bennie; JE Hoffman; MJ Coetzee

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Large areas of the soils under rainfed crop production in the semi-arid climate regions Southern Africa are of Aeolian origin with a sandy texture. These soils are prone to wind erosion, soil compaction and drought, which hamper sustainable crop production. Field experiments were conducted over three years in which 3 tillage practices were combined with 3 cropping practices. The tillage practices were: i) conventional mouldboard ploughing, ii) stubble mulch tillage, both in combination with deep ripping and controlled traffic, and iii) no-tillage with chemical weed control. Every tillage practice was combined with three cropping practices viz. i) continuous maize, ii) wheat with a 5-month fallow, and iii) maize and wheat in rotation allowing a 10-month fallow. It was found that continuously grown maize and wheat with conventional tillage gave the highest rainfall use efficiency. Conventionally grown maize and wheat in rotation with a longer fallow gave the highest yields, whereas no-tillage with continuous maize and wheat gave the lowest yields. The yields on stubble mulching were lower than those on conventional tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous maize under conventional tillage had the highest rainfall use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
rainfall use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuously grown maize and wheat with conventional tillage gave the highest rainfall use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat under conventional tillage had the highest rainfall use efficiency.

Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
rainfall use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuously grown maize and wheat with conventional tillage gave the highest rainfall use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional maize in rotation with a longer fallow gave the highest yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
in rotation with a longer fallowe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventionally grown maize and wheat in rotation with a longer fallow gave the highest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional wheat in rotation with a longer fallow gave the highest yield.

Treatment
in rotation with a longer fallowe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventionally grown maize and wheat in rotation with a longer fallow gave the highest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage continuous maize gave the lowest yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no-tillage with continuous maize and wheat gave the lowest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage wheat gave the lowest yields.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no-tillage with continuous maize and wheat gave the lowest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble mulching produced lower yields than conventional tillage.

Taxon
cropt0
Treatment
stubble mulchinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“The yields on stubble mulching were lower than those on conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.