Paper · 1993 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Influence of genotype, sowing date, and seeding rate on wheat development and yield

DR Coventry; TG Reeves; HD Brooke; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
59
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A 3-year study was conducted to measure the effect of sowing time and seeding rate on the development and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under high-yielding conditions in north-eastern Victoria. A range of wheat cultivars with different development responses, including 'winter' types, was used in 2 experiments in each season. High grain yields for dryland wheat were measured in the first 2 seasons (1985-86), and in 1985, near-optimal water use efficiencies (>18 kg/ha. mm effective rainfall) were obtained. In the third season (1987) grain yield was limited by adverse climatic conditions-in the me- and post-anthesis period. In each season, grain yield declined with delay in sowing time. In 1985 there was a loss of 200-250 kg grain/ha for each week's delay in sowing time. In 1987, yield loss with delayed sowing was 50-110 kg grain/ha. In each season, cultivars with late or midseason maturity development gave the highest mean yields, and the use of these maturity types allowed earlier sowing, in mid April. However, with late sowing of wheat there was a trend for early maturity types to give higher yields, and so the use of 2 wheat cultivars with distinct maturity development responses to climate is recommended. If only 1 wheat cultivar is to be used, then a late maturity type is recommended. Higher wheat yields were also obtained as spike density increased, as a result of higher seeding rates. Our data suggest that in the higher rainfall region of north-eastern Victoria, a spike density of about 500 spikes/m2 is required to optimise wheat yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield declined as sowing was delayed.

Treatment
delay in sowing timee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“In each season, grain yield declined with delay in sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1985, each week of delay in sowing lost 200-250 kg grain/ha of wheat yield.

Treatment
delay in sowing timee1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
losse1
Value
200-250 kg grain/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“In each season, grain yield declined with delay in sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1985 there was a loss of 200-250 kg grain/ha for each week's delay in sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1987, delayed sowing lost 50-110 kg grain/ha of wheat yield.

Treatment
delayed sowinge2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
yield losse2
Value
50-110 kg grain/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1987, yield loss with delayed sowing was 50-110 kg grain/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With late sowing, early maturity wheat types tended to give higher yields.

Treatment
late sowinge3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
there was a trende3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“with late sowing of wheat there was a trend for early maturity types to give higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars with late or midseason maturity gave the highest mean yields in each season.

Treatment
cultivars with late or midseason maturity developmente4
Outcome
mean yieldse4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e4

“In each season, cultivars with late or midseason maturity development gave the highest mean yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–955 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A spike density of about 500 spikes/m2 is required to optimise wheat yields in the higher-rainfall region of north-eastern Victoria.

Outcome
spike densitye5
Value
about 500 spikes/m2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e5

“a spike density of about 500 spikes/m2 is required to optimise wheat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1580 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two wheat cultivars with distinct maturity responses to climate should be used.

Outcome
the use of 2 wheat cultivarse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e6

“the use of 2 wheat cultivars with distinct maturity development responses to climate is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1238 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher wheat yields were obtained as spike density increased, as a result of higher seeding rates.

Treatment
higher seeding ratese7
Outcome
wheat yieldse7
Direction
Highere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e7

“Higher wheat yields were also obtained as spike density increased, as a result of higher seeding rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1424 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.