Paper · 1990 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Genetic variation and productivity of Populustrichocarpa and its hybrids.: IV. Performance in short-rotation coppice

Paul E. Heilman; R. F. Stettler

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Resprouting after harvest and rapid growth of sprouts are often considered essential for success of close-spaced, short-rotation cultural systems. This study examined resprouting, subsequent growth, and dry weight production following the initial 4-year harvest of a "common garden" trial of 50 clones of Populustrichocarpa Torr. & Gray. The clones were selected from 10 populations (sources) from major river drainages from western British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon. Additionally, three P. trichocarpa × P. deltoides (Bartr.) hybrids, a 'Robusta' clone, and a previously selected P. trichocarpa clone from Cottage Grove, Oregon, were included in the experiment. Mean yield of P. trichocarpa clones was 11.3 Mg•ha −1 •year −1 (CV among clones = 61%) in the coppice rotation vs. 12.6 Mg•ha −1 •year −1 (CV among clones = 40%) in the initial rotation; a difference that may, at least in part, be due to the use of less fertilizer in the coppice rotation. Nevertheless, a number of clones including the hybrids had higher yields in the coppice than in the initial rotation. Yield of clones in the coppice rotation was only moderately correlated with yield in the initial harvest (r 2 = 0.48), but the same two clones, hybrids 11-11 and 11-05, were the top-producing clones in both rotations. Cumulative mortality of P. trichocarpa at the end of the experiment, including failed cuttings, averaged 36%, but was highly variable (range = 7–66% among clones). Yield in both harvests differed significantly among sources of P. trichocarpa. As with other components of productivity reported earlier, performance in coppice varied significantly among the 50 P. trichocarpa clones, and more so than in the first rotation. Populustrichocarpa clones identified as superior in coppicing in this experiment represent potential parents for new hybrids intended for short-rotation systems involving coppicing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean yield of P. trichocarpa clones was lower in the coppice rotation (11.3 Mg ha-1 year-1) than in the initial rotation (12.6 Mg ha-1 year-1).

Taxon
P. trichocarpae1
Treatment
coppice rotatione1
Outcome
Mean yielde1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
11.3 Mg•ha −1 •year −1e1
Qualifier
may, at least in part, be due to the use of less fertilizer in the coppice rotatione2
Comparator
initial rotatione1

Verbatim

e1

“Mean yield of P. trichocarpa clones was 11.3 Mg•ha −1 •year −1 (CV among clones = 61%) in the coppice rotation vs. 12.6 Mg•ha −1 •year −1 (CV among clones = 40%) in the initial rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–855 · show in text ↑
e2

“a difference that may, at least in part, be due to the use of less fertilizer in the coppice rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A number of clones including the hybrids had higher yields in the coppice rotation than in the initial rotation.

Taxon
Populustrichocarpat0
Material
hybridse3
Treatment
coppicee3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
initial rotatione3

Verbatim

e3

“a number of clones including the hybrids had higher yields in the coppice than in the initial rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populustrichocarpa and its hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of clones in the coppice rotation was only moderately correlated with yield in the initial harvest (r2 = 0.48).

Taxon
Populustrichocarpat0
Outcome
Yield of clones in the coppice rotatione4
Value
r 2 = 0.48e4
Comparator
yield in the initial harveste4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e4

“Yield of clones in the coppice rotation was only moderately correlated with yield in the initial harvest (r 2 = 0.48)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populustrichocarpa and its hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same two clones, hybrids 11-11 and 11-05, were the top-producing clones in both rotations.

Taxon
Populustrichocarpat0
Material
hybrids 11-11 and 11-05e5
Outcome
top-producing clones in both rotationse5

Verbatim

e5

“the same two clones, hybrids 11-11 and 11-05, were the top-producing clones in both rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populustrichocarpa and its hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative mortality of P. trichocarpa at the end of the experiment averaged 36%, including failed cuttings.

Taxon
P. trichocarpae6
Outcome
Cumulative mortalitye6
Value
36%e6
Qualifier
including failed cuttingse6

Verbatim

e6

“Cumulative mortality of P. trichocarpa at the end of the experiment, including failed cuttings, averaged 36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative mortality of P. trichocarpa was highly variable among clones, with a range of 7-66%.

Taxon
P. trichocarpae6
Outcome
Cumulative mortalitye6
Value
7–66%e7
Qualifier
highly variablee7

Verbatim

e6

“Cumulative mortality of P. trichocarpa at the end of the experiment, including failed cuttings, averaged 36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1404 · show in text ↑
e7

“but was highly variable (range = 7–66% among clones)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1458 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in both harvests differed significantly among sources of P. trichocarpa.

Taxon
P. trichocarpae0
Material
sources of P. trichocarpae0
Outcome
Yield in both harvestse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Yield in both harvests differed significantly among sources of P. trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1537 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Performance in coppice varied significantly among the 50 P. trichocarpa clones, more so than in the first rotation.

Taxon
P. trichocarpae0
Outcome
performance in coppicee0
Direction
more soe0
Comparator
first rotatione0

Verbatim

e0

“performance in coppice varied significantly among the 50 P. trichocarpa clones, and more so than in the first rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1716 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Populus trichocarpa clones identified as superior in coppicing are potential parents for new hybrids for short-rotation systems involving coppicing.

Taxon
Populustrichocarpae0
Outcome
potential parents for new hybridse0

Verbatim

e0

“Populustrichocarpa clones identified as superior in coppicing in this experiment represent potential parents for new hybrids intended for short-rotation systems involving coppicing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1898 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Populus trichocarpa (black cottonwood)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.