Paper · 2014 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Effect of Cover Crop Species and Liquid Manure Application Rate on Green Manure Production, Leaf Mineral Content, Fruit Quality and Soil Chemical Properties in Pear Orchard

Seong Eun Lee; Jin Myeon Park; Young Eun Park; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cover cropping and liquid manure application are considered as effective ways to replace the use of chemical fertilizer in orchard. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of cover crop species and liquid manure application rate on green manure production, leaf mineral content, fruit quality and soil chemical properties in pear orchard. The treatments include rye and hairy vetch as cover crops, two liquid manure application levels based on N and $K_2O$ requirement on each cover crop species, and chemical fertilizer as control. Green manure production was higher in hairy vetch than in rye. K content of pear leaves and soil exchangeable K content increased in N based liquid manure application treatments. The yield was higher in rye + liquid manure and fertilizer treatments, and fruit quality was not different between the treatments. Taking all of these into account, rye + $K_2O$ requirement-based liquid manure application is recommended in pear orchard for not only sufficient nutrient supply but also prevention of any problem related with soil $K_2O$ accumulation in pear orchard in long-term perspective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure production was higher with hairy vetch than with rye.

Treatment
hairy vetche0
Outcome
Green manure productione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ryee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure production was higher in hairy vetch than in rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium content of pear leaves increased under N-based liquid manure application.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
N based liquid manure applicatione0
Outcome
K content of pear leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K content of pear leaves and soil exchangeable K content increased in N based liquid manure application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil exchangeable K content increased under N-based liquid manure application.

Treatment
N based liquid manure applicatione0
Outcome
soil exchangeable K contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K content of pear leaves and soil exchangeable K content increased in N based liquid manure application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was higher with rye plus liquid manure and with fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
rye + liquid manuree1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield was higher in rye + liquid manure and fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality was not different between the cover crop and liquid manure treatments.

Treatment
liquid manure application levelse3
Outcome
fruit qualitye2
Direction
not differente2
Comparator
chemical fertilizere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“fruit quality was not different between the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–852 · show in text ↑
e3

“two liquid manure application levels based on N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–456 · show in text ↑
e4

“chemical fertilizer as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–172 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rye with liquid manure applied at the K2O requirement is recommended for pear orchards.

Outcome
rye + $K_2O$ requirement-based liquid manure applicatione5
Qualifier
sufficient nutrient supplye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“rye + $K_2O$ requirement-based liquid manure application is recommended in pear orchard for not only sufficient nutrient supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–172 · show in text ↑

Vicia villosa · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.