Paper · 1968 · Agronomy Journal

The No‐Tillage System for Corn (Zea mays L.)1

J. N. Jones; J. E. Moody; G. M. Shear; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
56
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Corn ( Zea mays L.) grown under the no‐tillage system was compared with that grown under (1) systems involving increased amounts of tillage for 2 years, and (2) conventional turnplow tillage over a 6‐year period. Plant growth and yield of corn generally increased with decreasing degrees of tillage in the 2‐year test. Yields from no tillage during the 6‐year period were comparable to or ranged from 18 to 39% above yields from conventional turnplow tillage. Soil moisture measurements indicated that the dead sod mulch provided by the no‐tillage procedure was highly effective in reducing evaporation and runoff from the soil surface.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn growth and yield generally rose as tillage decreased in the two-year test.

Treatment
decreasing degrees of tillagee0
Outcome
Plant growth and yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and yield of corn generally increased with decreasing degrees of tillage in the 2‐year test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-year no-tillage yields were comparable to or 18 to 39% above conventional turnplow yields.

Treatment
no tillagee0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
comparable to or ranged from 18 to 39% abovee0
Value
18 to 39%e0
Comparator
conventional turnplow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields from no tillage during the 6‐year period were comparable to or ranged from 18 to 39% above yields from conventional turnplow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead sod mulch from no tillage reduced soil evaporation and runoff.

Treatment
dead sod mulch provided by the no‐tillage proceduree0
Outcome
evaporation and runoff from the soil surfacee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dead sod mulch provided by the no‐tillage procedure was highly effective in reducing evaporation and runoff from the soil surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑

mulching · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

112 papers: 97 positive, 15 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.