Abstract

Criteria are given for the timing and assessment of the effect of sprays on experimental plots, based on biological observations at Silwood Park from 1950 to 1955 and on previous work. A preliminary experiment on small plots in 1952 indicated that ‘blanket spraying’ with DDT and parathion throughout the life of the crop gave protection against both tiller and grain attack. A more detailed replicated plot trial in 1953 showed that for oats planted on 22 April two carefully timed tiller sprays with parathion reduced tiller infestation from 31 to 3%. Six panicle sprays at weekly intervals reduced a heavy grain attack of 60% to 13%. Dieldrin was also effective but significantly less so than parathion. Much of the damage to the crop was caused by weed growth following initial loss of the primary oat shoots. In 1954 and 1955 two and three parathion sprays were applied to 2‐acre fields in order to study recolonization. Despite almost complete control of the tiller generation, a normal evenly distributed infestation of the panicles was found. It is concluded that good control of the tiller generation may best be achieved by a spray programme based on knowledge of the phenology of the fly combined with that of the crop. The first general emergence in early May is likely to be critical. Reinvasion of a sprayed crop may take place within 4–5 days and panicle infestation may not be causally related to tiller infestation in the same field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two carefully timed tiller sprays with parathion reduced oat tiller infestation by the frit fly from 31 to 3%.

Treatment
two carefully timed tiller sprays with parathione1
Interactor
FRIT FLYOscinella fritt0pest
Outcome
tiller infestatione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
31 to 3%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oscinella frit
Oscinella frit · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“for oats planted on 22 April two carefully timed tiller sprays with parathion reduced tiller infestation from 31 to 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–552 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six panicle sprays at weekly intervals reduced the frit fly grain attack on oats from 60% to 13%.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Treatment
Six panicle sprays at weekly intervalse2
Interactor
FRIT FLYOscinella fritt0pest
Outcome
grain attacke2
Direction
reducede2
Value
60% to 13%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oscinella frit
Oscinella frit · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Six panicle sprays at weekly intervals reduced a heavy grain attack of 60% to 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dieldrin was effective against frit fly on oats but significantly less so than parathion.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Treatment
Dieldrine3
Interactor
FRIT FLYOscinella fritt0pest
Outcome
effectivee3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
parathione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oscinella frit
Oscinella frit · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Dieldrin was also effective but significantly less so than parathion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blanket spraying with DDT and parathion throughout the crop life protected oats against both tiller and grain attack by frit fly.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Treatment
DDT and parathion throughout the life of the crope4
Interactor
FRIT FLYOscinella fritt0pest
Outcome
protection against both tiller and grain attacke4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oscinella frit
Oscinella frit · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“with DDT and parathion throughout the life of the crop gave protection against both tiller and grain attack”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite almost complete control of the tiller generation, a normal evenly distributed panicle infestation was found.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Interactor
FRIT FLYOscinella fritt0pest
Outcome
normal evenly distributed infestation of the paniclese5
Qualifier
Despite almost complete control of the tiller generatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oscinella frit
Oscinella frit · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Despite almost complete control of the tiller generation, a normal evenly distributed infestation of the panicles was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reinvasion of a sprayed oat crop may take place within 4–5 days.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Interactor
FRIT FLYOscinella fritt0pest
Outcome
Reinvasion of a sprayed crope6
Value
4–5 dayse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oscinella frit
Oscinella frit · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Reinvasion of a sprayed crop may take place within 4–5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Much of the oat crop damage was caused by weed growth following loss of the primary oat shoots.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Interactor
weed growthe7weed
Outcome
damage to the crope7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Much of the damage to the crop was caused by weed growth following initial loss of the primary oat shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The first general emergence of the fly in early May is likely to be critical for spray timing.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Outcome
first general emergence in early Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first general emergence in early May is likely to be critical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Good control of the tiller generation may best be achieved by a spray programme based on the phenology of the fly combined with that of the crop.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Treatment
a spray programme based on knowledge of the phenology of the fly combined with that of the crope0
Outcome
good control of the tiller generatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“good control of the tiller generation may best be achieved by a spray programme based on knowledge of the phenology of the fly combined with that of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle infestation may not be causally related to tiller infestation in the same field.

Taxon
OAT CROPAvena sativat0
Outcome
panicle infestatione0
Comparator
tiller infestatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“panicle infestation may not be causally related to tiller infestation in the same field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY TREATMENTS ON INFESTATION OF THE OAT CROP BY THE FRIT FLY (OSCINELLA FRIT L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑

dieldrin · Oscinella frit · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

parathion · Oscinella frit · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Oscinella frit · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.