Paper · 2012 · Journal of Agricultural Sciences Belgrade

Effects of different soil amendments on the growth and yield of okra in a tropical rainforest of southwestern Nigeria

Moses Adewole; Abiola Ilesanmi

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different soil enhancers on the growth response of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] cultivated on a ?contaminated? field with sewage sludge from the two oxidation ponds of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Nigeria. This was with a view to assessing the growth performance and yield of the test crop under different soil amendments. Okra variety, NHAe 47-4 with NPK 12-12-17 (IO), compost organic fertilizer (OR), Glomus mosseae mycorrhiza (MY) and zero fertilizer applications as control (CT) was laid out in a completely randomised block design and each treatment plot (4 x 2 m) was replicated four times. Selected weather parameters were collected from a meteorological station in OAU campus during the period of the experiments. Growth parameters such as plant height, stem girth and number of leaves of okra increased with added soil amendments from four weeks after planting in the order: IO > OR > MY > CT. In 2010, the highest mean yield of 16.3 t ha-1 obtained with 6.0 t ha-1 of MY was not significantly higher than 15.4 t ha-1 obtained with application of 0.2 t ha-1 of IO, but significantly (p < 0.05) higher than 13.1 and 10.4 t ha-1 obtained with applications of 6.0 and zero t ha-1 of OR and CT respectively. Comparative okra yield, though relatively higher with mycorrhizal inoculation, but lower with no soil amendment was obtained in 2011. The study concluded that a direct linear relationship existed between solar radiation and okra productivity. Also, for a moderately ?treated field? with sewage sludge from domestic wastes, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can be integrated into soil fertility management to achieve low-cost sustainable agricultural systems for enhanced productivity of okra.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendments increased okra height, girth and leaf number in the order IO, OR, MY, CT.

Treatment
soil amendmentse0
Outcome
plant height, stem girth and number of leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth parameters such as plant height, stem girth and number of leaves of okra increased with added soil amendments from four weeks after planting in the order: IO > OR > MY > CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MY yielded 16.3 t ha-1 in 2010, not significantly above IO.

Treatment
6.0 t ha-1 of MYe0
Outcome
mean yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.3 t ha-1e0
Comparator
0.2 t ha-1 of IOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest mean yield of 16.3 t ha-1 obtained with 6.0 t ha-1 of MY was not significantly higher than 15.4 t ha-1 obtained with application of 0.2 t ha-1 of IO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MY yield significantly exceeded OR and CT yields in 2010.

Treatment
MYe1
Outcome
13.1 and 10.4 t ha-1e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
OR and CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“not significantly higher than 15.4 t ha-1 obtained with application of 0.2 t ha-1 of IO, but significantly (p < 0.05) higher than 13.1 and 10.4 t ha-1 obtained with applications of 6.0 and zero t ha-1 of OR and CT respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glomus mosseae mycorrhiza (MY)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra productivity increased with solar radiation.

Outcome
okra productivitye0
Setting
solar radiatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“a direct linear relationship existed between solar radiation and okra productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1525 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for soil fertility management of sewage sludge treated fields.

Outcome
integrated into soil fertility managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can be integrated into soil fertility management to achieve low-cost sustainable agricultural systems for enhanced productivity of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1771 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

other · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.